文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.

作者信息

Anaya Yohualli, Do Diana, Christensen Leslie, Schrager Sarina

机构信息

Department of Family of Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):108-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.240087.


DOI:10.1370/afm.240087
PMID:40127976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11936357/
Abstract

PURPOSE: Disparities in the use of shared decision making (SDM) affect minoritized patients. We sought to identify the barriers and facilitators to SDM among diverse patients. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in adherence to the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodologic framework. Our search of 4 databases-PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and PsycINFO-used controlled vocabulary and key word terms related to SDM in the care of racially and/or ethnically diverse adults in the primary care setting. We included peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States or Canada that evaluated the process of decision making and that had populations in which more than 50% of patients were from racial and/or ethnic minorities. Unique records were uploaded to a screening platform for independent review by 2 team members. We used grounded theory to guide our inductive approach and completed a thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies met all inclusion criteria. We identified 5 overarching themes: (1) factors regarding the decision-making process during the clinical encounter, (2) clinician practice characteristics, (3) trust in the clinician/health care system, (4) cultural congruence between clinician and patient, and (5) extrinsic factors affecting the decision-making process. Barriers of SDM included cultural and language discordance; prejudice, bias, and stereotypes; mistrust; and clinician time constraints. Facilitators of SDM included cultural concordance between clinician and patient; clinician language competence; and clear, honest, and humanistic communication with patients having the ability to ask questions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a set of potentially modifiable factors that facilitate or impede SDM. Our findings can help inform strategies and interventions to improve SDM among racially and/or ethnically diverse patient populations.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.

Ann Fam Med. 2025-3-24

[2]
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.

J Gen Intern Med. 2018-7-20

[3]
Minority patient preferences, barriers, and facilitators for shared decision-making with health care providers in the USA: A systematic review.

Patient Educ Couns. 2019-2-10

[4]
Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.

J Gen Intern Med. 2016-6

[5]
Shared decision making with black patients: A scoping review.

Patient Educ Couns. 2023-5

[6]
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-1-7

[7]
A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.

J Gen Intern Med. 2016-6

[8]
Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-21

[9]
Shared challenges and opportunities: Uncovering common ground in patient participation across different healthcare settings and patient groups. A qualitative meta-summary on patient-reported barriers and facilitators to participation in shared decision-making.

Patient Educ Couns. 2025-1

[10]
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023-2-24

本文引用的文献

[1]
Disparities in Shared Decision-Making Research and Practice: The Case for Black American Patients.

Ann Fam Med. 2023

[2]
Shared decision making with black patients: A scoping review.

Patient Educ Couns. 2023-5

[3]
Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic.

Womens Health Issues. 2023

[4]
Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Patient Educ Couns. 2023-1

[5]
Perception of coercion during contraceptive counseling among individuals with HIV.

Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022-12

[6]
Qualitative analysis of shared decision-making for chemoprevention in the primary care setting: provider-related barriers.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022-8-4

[7]
Contraceptive Decision-Making and the Importance of Side Effect Information Among a Sample of Latinas.

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022-1-31

[8]
Patient Recommendations for Shared Decision-Making in Uterine Fibroid Treatment Decisions.

J Patient Exp. 2021-10-20

[9]
Association Between Patient-Clinician Relationships and Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications Among Black Adults: An Observational Study Design.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021-7-20

[10]
Shared decision making for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with black transgender women.

Cult Health Sex. 2022-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索