Department of Gerontology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Feb;27(2):130-139. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006492. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
The growing use of social media creates opportunities for patients and families to provide feedback and rate individual healthcare providers. Whereas previous studies have examined this emerging trend in hospital and physician settings, little is known about user ratings of nursing homes (NHs) and how these ratings relate to other measures of quality.
To examine the relationship between Facebook user-generated NH ratings and other measures of NH satisfaction/experience and quality.
This study compared Facebook user ratings of NHs in Maryland (n=225) and Minnesota (n=335) to resident/family satisfaction/experience survey ratings and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 5-star NH report card ratings.
Overall, 55 NHs in Maryland had an official Facebook page, of which 35 provided the opportunity for users to rate care in the facility. In Minnesota, 126 NHs had a Facebook page, of which 78 allowed for user ratings. NHs with higher aid staffing levels, not affiliated with a chain and located in higher income counties were more likely to have a Facebook page. Facebook ratings were not significantly correlated with the CMS 5-star rating or survey-based resident/family satisfaction ratings.
Given the disconnect between Facebook ratings and other, more scientifically grounded measures of quality, concerns about the validity and use of social media ratings are warranted. However, it is likely consumers will increasingly turn to social media ratings of NHs, given the lack of consumer perspective on most state and federal report card sites. Thus, social media ratings may present a unique opportunity for healthcare report cards to capture real-time consumer voice.
社交媒体的使用日益增多,为患者和家属提供了反馈和评价个别医疗保健提供者的机会。虽然先前的研究已经考察了医院和医生环境中这一新兴趋势,但对于疗养院(NH)的用户评分以及这些评分与其他质量衡量标准的关系知之甚少。
考察 Facebook 用户对 NH 的评分与 NH 满意度/体验和质量的其他衡量标准之间的关系。
本研究比较了马里兰州(n=225)和明尼苏达州(n=335)的 Facebook 用户对 NH 的评分与居民/家庭满意度/体验调查评分以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的 5 星级 NH 报告卡评分。
总体而言,马里兰州有 55 家 NH 有官方 Facebook 页面,其中 35 家提供了对该机构护理进行评分的机会。在明尼苏达州,有 126 家 NH 有 Facebook 页面,其中 78 家允许用户评分。援助人员配备水平较高、不隶属于连锁机构且位于高收入县的 NH 更有可能拥有 Facebook 页面。Facebook 评分与 CMS 5 星级评分或基于调查的居民/家庭满意度评分均无显著相关性。
鉴于 Facebook 评分与其他更具科学依据的质量衡量标准之间存在脱节,有必要对社交媒体评分的有效性和使用提出质疑。然而,鉴于大多数州和联邦报告卡网站缺乏消费者视角,消费者很可能会越来越多地转向 NH 的社交媒体评分。因此,社交媒体评分可能为医疗保健报告卡提供了一个独特的机会,可以实时捕捉消费者的声音。