Pentecost M, Ross F C, Macnab A
1Institute for Social and Cultural Anthropology,University of Oxford,Oxford,UK.
2Anthropology,School of African and Gender Studies, Anthropology and Linguistics,University of Cape Town,Cape Town,South Africa.
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018 Feb;9(1):10-14. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000629. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Pregnant women, children under 2 and the first thousand days of life have been principal targets for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease interventions. This paradigm has been criticized for laying responsibility for health outcomes on pregnant women and mothers and through the thousand days focus inadvertently deflecting attention from other windows for intervention. Drawing on insights from the South African context, this commentary argues for integrated and inclusive interventions that encompass broader social framings. First, future interventions should include a wider range of actors. Second, broader action frameworks should encompass life-course approaches that identify multiple windows of opportunity for intervention. Using two examples - the inclusion of men, and engagement with adolescents - this commentary offers strategies for producing more inclusive interventions by using a broader social framework.
孕妇、2岁以下儿童以及生命最初的一千天一直是健康与疾病发育起源干预措施的主要目标。这种模式受到了批评,因为它将健康结果的责任归咎于孕妇和母亲,并且通过关注这一千天,无意中转移了对其他干预窗口的注意力。借鉴南非的情况,本评论主张采取综合和包容性的干预措施,包括更广泛的社会框架。首先,未来的干预措施应纳入更广泛的行为主体。其次,更广泛的行动框架应包括生命历程方法,以确定多个干预机会窗口。通过两个例子——男性的纳入以及与青少年的接触——本评论提供了利用更广泛的社会框架制定更具包容性干预措施的策略。