• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄校正合并症指数对植入心脏再同步治疗设备的心力衰竭患者生存的影响

Impact of an Age-Adjusted Co-morbidity Index on Survival of Patients With Heart Failure Implanted With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices.

作者信息

Ioannou Adam, Papageorgiou Nikolaos, Barber Harry, Falconer Debbie, Barra Sergio, Babu Girish, Ahsan Syed, Rowland Edward, Hunter Ross, Lowe Martin, Schilling Richard, Lambiase Pier, Chow Anthony, Providencia Rui

机构信息

St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; University College of London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1158-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.056. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.056
PMID:28784235
Abstract

Age is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with heart failure. We aimed to assess the impact of age and noncardiac co-morbidities in the outcome of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and determine which of these two factors is the most important predictor of survival. The study involved a single-center retrospective assessment of 697 consecutive CRT implants during a 12-year period. Patient co-morbidity profile was assessed using the Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) and the Charlson Age-Co-morbidity Index (CACI). Predictors of survival free from heart transplantation were assessed. CRT-related complications and cause of death analysis were assessed within tertiles of the CACI. During a mean follow-up of 1,813 ± 1,177 days, 347 patients (49.9%) died and 37 (5.3%) underwent heart transplantation. On multivariate Cox regression, female gender (HR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 0.99, p = 0.041), estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR per ml/min = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99, p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR per % = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00, p = 0.022), New York Heart Association class (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.20, p < 0.001), presence of left bundle branch block (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87, p = 0.001), and CACI tertile (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.59, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. Compared with age and the CCI, the CACI was the best discriminator of all-cause mortality. Inappropriate therapies occurred less frequently in higher co-morbidity tertiles. In conclusion, patient co-morbidity profile adjusted to age impacts on mortality after CRT implantation. Use of the CACI may help refine guideline criteria to identify patients more likely to benefit from CRT.

摘要

年龄是心力衰竭患者的一个不良预后因素。我们旨在评估年龄和非心脏合并症对接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者预后的影响,并确定这两个因素中哪一个是生存的最重要预测因素。该研究涉及对12年间连续697例CRT植入患者进行单中心回顾性评估。使用Charlson合并症指数(CCI)和Charlson年龄合并症指数(CACI)评估患者的合并症情况。评估无心脏移植生存的预测因素。在CACI三分位数范围内评估CRT相关并发症和死亡原因分析。在平均1813±1177天的随访期间,347例患者(49.9%)死亡,37例(5.3%)接受了心脏移植。在多因素Cox回归分析中,女性性别(HR = 0.78,95%置信区间[CI] 0.62至0.99,p = 0.041)、估计肾小球滤过率(每毫升/分钟HR = 0.99,95% CI 0.98至0.99,p < 0.001)、左心室射血分数(每百分比HR = 0.99,95% CI 0.98至1.00,p = 0.022)、纽约心脏协会分级(HR = 1.83,95% CI 1.53至2.20,p < 0.001)、左束支传导阻滞的存在(HR = 0.70,95% CI 0.56至0.87,p = 0.001)以及CACI三分位数(HR = 1.37,95% CI 1.18至1.59,p < 0.001)是全因死亡率或心脏移植的独立预测因素。与年龄和CCI相比,CACI是全因死亡率的最佳判别指标。在合并症较高的三分位数中,不适当治疗的发生率较低。总之,根据年龄调整的患者合并症情况会影响CRT植入后的死亡率。使用CACI可能有助于完善指南标准,以识别更可能从CRT中获益的患者。

相似文献

1
Impact of an Age-Adjusted Co-morbidity Index on Survival of Patients With Heart Failure Implanted With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices.年龄校正合并症指数对植入心脏再同步治疗设备的心力衰竭患者生存的影响
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1158-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.056. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Mild Heart Failure With Moderate Renal Dysfunction.伴有中度肾功能障碍的轻度心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗的长期结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;8(4):725-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002082. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
3
Prognostic implication of baseline PR interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.基线 PR 间期对心脏再同步治疗患者预后的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Nov;12(11):2256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
4
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.
5
Risk factors and the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in MADIT-CRT.MADIT-CRT 中的心脏再同步治疗的心脏和非心脏死亡率的风险因素及影响。
Europace. 2015 Dec;17(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv201. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
QRS duration, bundle-branch block morphology, and outcomes among older patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.QRS 时限、束支传导阻滞形态与心力衰竭老年患者心脏再同步治疗的结局
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):617-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8641.
7
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
8
Atrioventricular delay programming and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in MADIT-CRT.房室延迟程控和心脏再同步治疗在 MADIT-CRT 中的获益。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 25.
9
Relation of QRS Duration to Clinical Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients Without Left Bundle Branch Block: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Substudy.无左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者中QRS时限与心脏再同步治疗临床获益的关系:心脏再同步治疗多中心自动除颤器植入试验子研究
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002667.
10
PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy.PR 间期可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者的临床反应:多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗亚研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):645-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood groups and Rhesus status as potential predictors of outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy.血型和 Rh 因子状况作为心脏再同步治疗患者结局的潜在预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58747-8.
2
Improved prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy over a decade.十余年心脏再同步化治疗预后改善。
Europace. 2023 Jun 2;25(6). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad141.
3
Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Outcomes.合并症负担对心脏植入式电子设备预后的影响。
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2022 Jun 27;16:11795468221108212. doi: 10.1177/11795468221108212. eCollection 2022.
4
Incremental prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging over the co-morbid burden in acute decompensated heart failure.急性失代偿性心力衰竭中心肌间碘苄胍显像相对于共病负担的增量预后价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1167-1177. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13173. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Full blood count as potential predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.全血细胞计数作为预测心脏再同步治疗患者结局的潜在指标。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):13016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49659-z.
6
Survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from 50 084 implantations.心脏再同步治疗后的生存:50084 例植入的结果。
Europace. 2019 May 1;21(5):754-762. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy267.
7
Impact of Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity on Hospital Survival and Short-Term Outcome of Patients with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.年龄校正的查尔森合并症对体外心肺复苏患者医院生存率和短期结局的影响。
J Clin Med. 2018 Sep 29;7(10):313. doi: 10.3390/jcm7100313.