Suppr超能文献

性别差异的临床结果与精准医学:机构审查委员会和研究伦理委员会的重要新角色

Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees.

作者信息

Segarra Ignacio, Modamio Pilar, Fernández Cecilia, Mariño Eduardo L

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy Unit, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of BarcelonaBarcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 21;8:488. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00488. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The efforts toward individualized medicine have constantly increased in an attempt to improve treatment options. These efforts have led to the development of small molecules which target specific molecular pathways involved in cancer progression. We have reviewed preclinical studies of sunitinib that incorporate sex as a covariate to explore possible sex-based differences in pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions (DDI) to attempt a relationship with published clinical outputs. We observed that covariate sex is lacking in most clinical outcome reports and suggest a series of ethic-based proposals to improve research activities and identify relevant different sex outcomes. We propose a deeper integration of preclinical, clinical, and translational research addressing statistical and clinical significance jointly; to embed specific sex-divergent endpoints to evaluate possible gender differences objectively during all stages of research; to pay greater attention to sex-divergent outcomes in polypharmacy scenarios, DDI and bioequivalence studies; the clear reporting of preclinical and clinical findings regarding sex-divergent outcomes; as well as to encourage the active role of scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to foster a new scientific culture through their research programs, practice, and participation in editorial boards and Institutional Ethics Review Boards (IRBs) and Research Ethics Committees (RECs). We establish the IRB/REC as the centerpiece for the implementation of these proposals. We suggest the expansion of its competence to follow up clinical trials to ensure that sex differences are addressed and recognized; to engage in data monitoring committees to improve clinical research cooperation and ethically address those potential clinical outcome differences between male and female patients to analyze their social and clinical implications in research and healthcare policies.

摘要

为了改善治疗方案,针对个性化医疗的努力一直在不断增加。这些努力催生了靶向参与癌症进展的特定分子途径的小分子药物。我们回顾了将性别作为协变量纳入的舒尼替尼临床前研究,以探索药代动力学和药物相互作用(DDI)中可能存在的性别差异,试图与已发表的临床结果建立联系。我们观察到大多数临床结果报告中缺乏协变量性别信息,并提出了一系列基于伦理的建议,以改进研究活动并确定相关的不同性别结果。我们建议将临床前、临床和转化研究进行更深入的整合,共同解决统计学和临床意义;在研究的所有阶段嵌入特定的性别差异终点,以客观评估可能存在的性别差异;在多药治疗方案、DDI和生物等效性研究中更加关注性别差异结果;明确报告关于性别差异结果的临床前和临床研究发现;以及鼓励科学家和制药行业发挥积极作用,通过他们的研究项目、实践以及参与编辑委员会、机构伦理审查委员会(IRB)和研究伦理委员会(REC)来培育一种新的科学文化。我们将IRB/REC确立为实施这些建议的核心。我们建议扩大其权限,跟进临床试验以确保解决并认识到性别差异;参与数据监测委员会,以改善临床研究合作,并从伦理角度处理男性和女性患者之间潜在的临床结果差异,分析其在研究和医疗政策中的社会和临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0812/5519571/9b11f301d0f0/fphar-08-00488-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验