• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯坦因:用于无缝I/II期临床试验的简单毒性和疗效区间设计。

STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.

作者信息

Lin Ruitao, Yin Guosheng

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, Washington, U.S.A.

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2017 Nov 20;36(26):4106-4120. doi: 10.1002/sim.7428. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1002/sim.7428
PMID:28786138
Abstract

Seamless phase I/II dose-finding trials are attracting increasing attention nowadays in early-phase drug development for oncology. Most existing phase I/II dose-finding methods use sophisticated yet untestable models to quantify dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy relationships, which always renders them difficult to implement in practice. To simplify the practical implementation, we extend the Bayesian optimal interval design from maximum tolerated dose finding to optimal biological dose finding in phase I/II trials. In particular, optimized intervals for toxicity and efficacy are respectively derived by minimizing probabilities of incorrect classifications. If the pair of observed toxicity and efficacy probabilities at the current dose is located inside the promising region, we retain the current dose; if the observed probabilities are outside of the promising region, we propose an allocation rule by maximizing the posterior probability that the response rate of the next dose falls inside a prespecified efficacy probability interval while still controlling the level of toxicity. The proposed interval design is model-free, thus is suitable for various dose-response relationships. We conduct extensive simulation studies to demonstrate the small- and large-sample performance of the proposed method under various scenarios. Compared to existing phase I/II dose-finding designs, not only is our interval design easy to implement in practice, but it also possesses desirable and robust operating characteristics.

摘要

无缝I/II期剂量探索试验在肿瘤学早期药物研发中如今正受到越来越多的关注。大多数现有的I/II期剂量探索方法使用复杂但未经检验的模型来量化剂量-毒性和剂量-疗效关系,这使得它们在实际中总是难以实施。为了简化实际操作,我们将贝叶斯最优区间设计从I期最大耐受剂量探索扩展到I/II期最优生物学剂量探索。具体而言,通过最小化错误分类的概率分别得出毒性和疗效的优化区间。如果当前剂量下观察到的毒性和疗效概率对位于有前景的区域内,我们保留当前剂量;如果观察到的概率在有前景的区域之外,我们提出一种分配规则,通过最大化下一个剂量的反应率落在预先指定的疗效概率区间内的后验概率,同时仍控制毒性水平。所提出的区间设计是无模型的,因此适用于各种剂量反应关系。我们进行了广泛的模拟研究,以证明所提出方法在各种情况下的小样本和大样本性能。与现有的I/II期剂量探索设计相比,我们的区间设计不仅在实际中易于实施,而且还具有理想且稳健的操作特性。

相似文献

1
STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.斯坦因:用于无缝I/II期临床试验的简单毒性和疗效区间设计。
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 20;36(26):4106-4120. doi: 10.1002/sim.7428. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
2
Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology.贝叶斯分层模型在肿瘤学I/II期临床试验中的应用。
Pharm Stat. 2017 Mar;16(2):114-121. doi: 10.1002/pst.1793. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.一种基于效用的贝叶斯最优区间(U-BOIN)I/II期设计,用于确定靶向治疗和免疫治疗的最佳生物学剂量。
Stat Med. 2019 Dec 10;38(28):5299-5316. doi: 10.1002/sim.8361. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.药物联合试验中剂量探索的贝叶斯最优区间设计
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Oct;26(5):2155-2167. doi: 10.1177/0962280215594494. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.假设部分随机排序的分子靶向药物联合使用的贝叶斯剂量探索设计
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
6
uTPI: A utility-based toxicity probability interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials.uTPI:一种基于效用的毒性概率区间设计,用于 I/II 期剂量探索试验。
Stat Med. 2021 May 20;40(11):2626-2649. doi: 10.1002/sim.8922. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.一项用于评估疗效和毒性且具有延迟结果的贝叶斯适应性I-II期临床试验。
Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):38-48. doi: 10.1177/1740774513500589. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.用于无缝I/II期剂量探索设计的改进自适应随机化策略。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):333-347. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535496. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
9
A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.一种用于确定I/II期临床试验最佳生物学剂量的稳健两阶段设计。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):27-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.7082. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
10
Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.基于肿瘤血液学 I/II 期试验疗效的剂量探索设计。
Stat Med. 2011 Jun 15;30(13):1574-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.4152. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Adaptive Design Approach for Early-Phase Clinical Trials to Optimize Vaccine Dosage.一种用于早期临床试验以优化疫苗剂量的新型自适应设计方法。
China CDC Wkly. 2025 Apr 25;7(17):592-598. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.097.
2
Bayesian model averaging for randomized dose optimization trials in multiple indications.用于多适应症随机剂量优化试验的贝叶斯模型平均法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Feb 10:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2025.2450325.
3
Joint TITE-CRM: A Design for Dose Finding Studies for Therapies with Late-Onset Safety and Activity Outcomes.
联合TITE-CRM:针对具有迟发性安全性和活性结果的疗法进行剂量探索研究的一种设计。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2024 Mar 20;17(1):149-160. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2024.2333388. eCollection 2025.
4
Phase I clinical trial designs in oncology: A systematic literature review from 2020 to 2022.肿瘤学中的I期临床试验设计:2020年至2022年的系统文献综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 24;8(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.599. eCollection 2024.
5
A Bayesian latent-subgroup platform design for dose optimization.一种用于剂量优化的贝叶斯潜在亚组平台设计。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae093.
6
REDOMA: Bayesian random-effects dose-optimization meta-analysis using spike-and-slab priors.REDoMA:基于尖峰-哑块先验的贝叶斯随机效应剂量优化荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2024 Aug 15;43(18):3484-3502. doi: 10.1002/sim.10107. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
Statistical and practical considerations in planning and conduct of dose-optimization trials.规划和实施剂量优化试验的统计学和实际考虑因素。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):273-286. doi: 10.1177/17407745231207085. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
8
Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.适用于靶向药物和免疫疗法的最佳生物剂量的适应性 I- II 期临床试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):298-307. doi: 10.1177/17407745231220661. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
9
Accuracy and Safety of Novel Designs for Phase I Drug-Combination Oncology Trials.I期肿瘤药物联合试验新设计的准确性和安全性
Stat Biopharm Res. 2022;14(3):270-282. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2022.2081602. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
10
Comparison Between Simultaneous and Sequential Utilization of Safety and Efficacy for Optimal Dose Determination in Bayesian Model-Assisted Designs.贝叶斯模型辅助设计中为最优剂量确定同时利用安全性和疗效与序贯利用安全性和疗效的比较。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):728-736. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00517-1. Epub 2023 Apr 22.