1 St. Vincent's Hospital, Sacred Heart Rehabilitation Service, Sydney, Australia.
2 St. George Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kogarah, Australia.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1189-1200. doi: 10.1177/0269215517694462. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
To investigate the impact of an in-reach rehabilitation team for patients admitted after road trauma.
Randomised control trial of usual care versus early involvement of in-reach rehabilitation team. Telephone follow-up was conducted by a blind assessor at three months for those with minor/moderate injuries and six months for serious/severe injuries.
Four participating trauma services in New South Wales, Australia.
A total of 214 patients admitted during 2012-2015 with a length of stay of at least five days.
Provision of rehabilitation services in parallel with ward based therapy using an in-reach team for the intervention group. The control group could still access the ward based therapy (usual care).
The primary outcome was acute length of stay. Secondary outcomes included percentage requiring inpatient rehabilitation, function (Functional Independence Measure and Timed Up and Go Test), psychological status (Depression Anxiety and Stress Score 21), pain (Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire) and quality of life (Short Form-12 v2).
Median length of stay in acute care was 13 days (IQR 8-21). The intervention group, compared to the control group, received more physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions (median number of sessions 16.0 versus 11.5, P=0.003). However, acute length of stay did not differ between the intervention and control groups (median 15 vs 12 days, P=0.37). There were no significant differences observed in the secondary outcomes at hospital discharge and follow-up.
No additional benefit was found from the routine use of acute rehabilitation teams for trauma patients over and above usual care.
调查入组康复团队对创伤后住院患者的影响。
常规治疗与早期入组康复团队的随机对照试验。对轻度/中度损伤患者进行三个月的电话随访,对严重/重度损伤患者进行六个月的电话随访。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州的四个参与创伤服务机构。
2012-2015 年期间至少住院五天的 214 名患者。
为干预组提供与病房基础治疗并行的康复服务,使用入组团队。对照组仍可接受病房基础治疗(常规护理)。
主要结局为急性住院时间。次要结局包括需要住院康复的比例、功能(功能独立性测量和计时起立行走测试)、心理状态(抑郁焦虑和压力评分 21)、疼痛(奥勒布罗肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷)和生活质量(短表单 12 版本 2)。
急性照护中位数住院时间为 13 天(IQR 8-21)。与对照组相比,干预组接受了更多的物理治疗和职业治疗(中位数治疗次数 16.0 比 11.5,P=0.003)。然而,干预组和对照组的急性住院时间没有差异(中位数 15 比 12 天,P=0.37)。在出院和随访时,次要结局均无显著差异。
在常规护理之外,常规使用急性康复团队对创伤患者没有额外获益。