De Dios Perez Blanca, McQueen Jean, Craven Kristelle, Radford Kate, Blake Holly, Smith Benjamin, Thomson Louise, Holmes Jain
Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
McQueen Training and Health Consultancy, Ayr, UK.
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Jul;86(7):467-481. doi: 10.1177/03080226231170996. Epub 2023 May 14.
People with long-term conditions or recovering from serious injuries can struggle to return to work. The evidence for occupational therapy supporting return to work is limited. We aimed to identify and explain how occupational therapy interventions work.
Systematic review. Seven databases were searched between 1 January 1980 and 15 June 2022. Studies measuring work-related outcomes among individuals receiving occupational therapy during absence from paid work were included. Multiple reviewers independently contributed to screening, quality appraisal and data extraction processes. Data were analysed as a narrative.
Twenty studies with 3866 participants were included; 17 were assessed as having high risk of bias. Occupational therapy was inconsistently acknowledged affecting study identification and occupational therapy components were poorly described. Meta-analysis was unfeasible due to outcome heterogeneity. Individually tailored occupational therapy focused on return to work in musculoskeletal conditions indicated the most promising outcomes. Key intervention components included vocational assessment, goal setting and self-management. Key mechanisms of action included early intervention, individualised support and being responsive to needs.
Occupational therapists' contributions supporting return to work should be clearly attributed. Future effectiveness research should standardise the measurement of work outcomes to support meta-analysis. Developing a taxonomy for occupational therapy supporting return to work could facilitate comparisons across studies, highlighting occupational therapists' roles and facilitating training and benefits to patients.
患有长期疾病或正在从重伤中恢复的人在重返工作岗位时可能会遇到困难。职业治疗对支持重返工作岗位的证据有限。我们旨在确定并解释职业治疗干预措施的作用方式。
系统评价。检索了1980年1月1日至2022年6月15日期间的七个数据库。纳入了测量在带薪工作缺勤期间接受职业治疗的个体与工作相关结果的研究。多位评审员独立参与筛选、质量评估和数据提取过程。数据作为叙述性内容进行分析。
纳入了20项研究,共3866名参与者;17项被评估为存在高偏倚风险。职业治疗对研究识别的影响未得到一致认可,职业治疗的组成部分描述不佳。由于结果异质性,荟萃分析不可行。针对肌肉骨骼疾病患者重返工作岗位的个性化职业治疗显示出最有前景的结果。关键干预组成部分包括职业评估、目标设定和自我管理。关键作用机制包括早期干预、个性化支持和对需求做出响应。
职业治疗师对支持重返工作岗位的贡献应得到明确归因。未来的有效性研究应使工作结果的测量标准化,以支持荟萃分析。制定支持重返工作岗位的职业治疗分类法可以促进不同研究之间的比较,突出职业治疗师的作用,并促进培训以及给患者带来益处。