Tschon Matilde, Veronesi Francesca, Contartese Deyanira, Sartori Maria, Martini Lucia, Vincenzi Fabrizio, Ravani Annalisa, Varani Katia, Fini Milena
Laboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Laboratory of Biocompatibility, Technological Innovations and Advanced Therapies, Research Innovation and Technology Department (RIT), Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Mar;233(3):2645-2656. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26143. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
Osteolysis is the main limiting cause for the survival of an orthopedic prosthesis and is accompanied by an enhancement in osteoclastogenesis and inflammation, due by wear debris formation. Unfortunately therapeutic treatments, besides revision surgery, are not available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields (PEMFs) and platelet rich plasma (PRP), alone or in combination, in an in vitro model of osteolysis. Rats peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cultured on Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene particles and divided into four groups of treatments: (1) PEMF stimulation (12 hr/day, 2.5 mT, 75 Hz, 1.3 ms pulse duration); (2) 10% PRP; (3) combination of PEMFs, and PRP; (4) no treatment. Treatments were performed for 3 days and cell viability, osteoclast number, expression of genes related to osteoclastogenesis and inflammation and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines were assessed up to 14 days. PEMF stimulation exerted best results because it increased cell viability at early time points and counteracted osteoclastogenesis at 14 days. On the contrary, PRP increased osteoclastogenesis and reduced cell viability in comparison to PEMFs alone. The combination of PEMFs and PRP increased cell viability over time and reduced osteoclastogenesis in comparison to PRP alone. However, these positive results did not exceed the level achieved by PEMF alone. At longer time points PEMF could not counteract osteoclastogenesis increased by PRP. Regarding inflammation, all treatments maintained the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines at low level, although PRP increased the level of interleukin 1 beta.
骨溶解是骨科假体存活的主要限制因素,由于磨损颗粒的形成,它会伴随着破骨细胞生成增加和炎症反应增强。不幸的是,除了翻修手术外,尚无其他治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估脉冲电磁场(PEMF)和富血小板血浆(PRP)单独或联合使用在骨溶解体外模型中的效果。将大鼠外周血单核细胞培养在超高分子量聚乙烯颗粒上,并分为四组处理:(1)PEMF刺激(每天12小时,2.5 mT,75 Hz,1.3 ms脉冲持续时间);(2)10% PRP;(3)PEMF与PRP联合使用;(4)不进行处理。处理持续3天,并在长达14天的时间内评估细胞活力、破骨细胞数量、与破骨细胞生成和炎症相关的基因表达以及促炎细胞因子的产生。PEMF刺激产生了最佳效果,因为它在早期时间点增加了细胞活力,并在14天时抵消了破骨细胞生成。相反,与单独使用PEMF相比,PRP增加了破骨细胞生成并降低了细胞活力。与单独使用PRP相比,PEMF和PRP的联合使用随着时间的推移增加了细胞活力并减少了破骨细胞生成。然而,这些积极结果并未超过单独使用PEMF所达到的水平。在较长时间点,PEMF无法抵消PRP增加的破骨细胞生成。关于炎症,所有处理均将促炎细胞因子的产生维持在低水平,尽管PRP增加了白细胞介素1β的水平。