Mendoza-Cano Oliver, Hernandez-Suarez Carlos Moisés, Trujillo Xochitl, Ochoa Diaz-Lopez Héctor, Lugo-Radillo Agustin, Espinoza-Gomez Francisco, de la Cruz-Ruiz Miriam, Sánchez-Piña Ramón Alberto, Murillo-Zamora Efrén
Facultad de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28400, Mexico.
Center for Health and the Global Environment, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 8;14(8):890. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080890.
Dengue fever is considered to be one of the most important arboviral diseases globally. Unsuccessful vector-control strategies might be due to the lack of sustainable community participation. The state of Colima, located in the Western region of Mexico, is a dengue-endemic area despite vector-control activities implemented, which may be due to an insufficient health economic analysis of these interventions. A randomized controlled community trial took place in five urban municipalities where 24 clusters were included. The study groups ( = 4) included an intervention to improve the community participation in vector control (A), ultra-low volume (ULV) spraying (B), both interventions (AB), and a control group. The main outcomes investigated were dengue cumulative incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and the direct costs per intervention. The cumulative incidence of dengue was 17.4%, A; 14.3%, B; 14.4%, AB; and 30.2% in the control group. The highest efficiency and effectiveness were observed in group B (0.526 and 6.97, respectively) and intervention A was more likely to be cost-effective ($3952.84 per DALY avoided) followed by intervention B ($4472.09 per DALY avoided). Our findings suggest that efforts to improve community participation in vector control and ULV-spraying alone are cost-effective and may be useful to reduce the vector density and dengue incidence.
登革热被认为是全球最重要的虫媒病毒病之一。病媒控制策略未取得成功可能是由于缺乏社区的持续参与。科利马州位于墨西哥西部地区,尽管开展了病媒控制活动,但仍是登革热流行地区,这可能是因为对这些干预措施的卫生经济分析不足。在五个城市市镇进行了一项随机对照社区试验,纳入了24个群组。研究组(=4)包括一项提高社区参与病媒控制的干预措施(A)、超低容量(ULV)喷洒(B)、两项干预措施(AB)以及一个对照组。调查的主要结果是登革热累积发病率、伤残调整生命年(DALYs)以及每项干预措施的直接成本。登革热累积发病率在A组为17.4%,B组为14.3%,AB组为14.4%,对照组为30.2%。在B组观察到最高的效率和效果(分别为0.526和6.97),干预措施A更有可能具有成本效益(每避免一个DALY为3952.84美元),其次是干预措施B(每避免一个DALY为4472.09美元)。我们的研究结果表明,提高社区参与病媒控制以及单独进行超低容量喷洒的努力具有成本效益,可能有助于降低病媒密度和登革热发病率。