Suppr超能文献

评估产科团队协作表现:对有效工具的系统检索与综述

Assessing teamwork performance in obstetrics: A systematic search and review of validated tools.

作者信息

Fransen Annemarie F, de Boer Liza, Kienhorst Dieneke, Truijens Sophie E, van Runnard Heimel Pieter J, Oei S Guid

机构信息

Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven-Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

Abstract

Teamwork performance is an essential component for the clinical efficiency of multi-professional teams in obstetric care. As patient safety is related to teamwork performance, it has become an important learning goal in simulation-based education. In order to improve teamwork performance, reliable assessment tools are required. These can be used to provide feedback during training courses, or to compare learning effects between different types of training courses. The aim of the current study is to (1) identify the available assessment tools to evaluate obstetric teamwork performance in a simulated environment, and (2) evaluate their psychometric properties in order to identify the most valuable tool(s) to use. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to identify articles describing assessment tools for the evaluation of obstetric teamwork performance in a simulated environment. In order to evaluate the quality of the identified assessment tools the standards and grading rules have been applied as recommended by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Committee on Educational Outcomes. The included studies were also assessed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence. This search resulted in the inclusion of five articles describing the following six tools: Clinical Teamwork Scale, Human Factors Rating Scale, Global Rating Scale, Assessment of Obstetric Team Performance, Global Assessment of Obstetric Team Performance, and the Teamwork Measurement Tool. Based on the ACGME guidelines we assigned a Class 3, level C of evidence, to all tools. Regarding the OCEBM levels of evidence, a level 3b was assigned to two studies and a level 4 to four studies. The Clinical Teamwork Scale demonstrated the most comprehensive validation, and the Teamwork Measurement Tool demonstrated promising results, however it is recommended to further investigate its reliability.

摘要

团队协作表现是产科护理多专业团队临床效率的重要组成部分。由于患者安全与团队协作表现相关,它已成为基于模拟的教育中的一个重要学习目标。为了提高团队协作表现,需要可靠的评估工具。这些工具可用于在培训课程中提供反馈,或比较不同类型培训课程之间的学习效果。本研究的目的是:(1)识别在模拟环境中评估产科团队协作表现的可用评估工具;(2)评估其心理测量特性,以确定最有价值的工具。我们在PubMed、MEDLINE和EMBASE中进行了系统检索,以识别描述在模拟环境中评估产科团队协作表现的评估工具的文章。为了评估所识别评估工具的质量,已按照毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)教育成果委员会推荐的标准和分级规则进行应用。纳入的研究也根据牛津循证医学中心(OCEBM)的证据水平进行了评估。本次检索结果纳入了五篇文章,描述了以下六种工具:临床团队协作量表、人为因素评定量表、整体评定量表、产科团队表现评估、产科团队整体评估和团队协作测量工具。根据ACGME指南,我们将所有工具的证据等级定为3级C级。关于OCEBM证据水平,两项研究被定为3b级,四项研究被定为4级。临床团队协作量表展示了最全面的验证,团队协作测量工具展示了有前景的结果,不过建议进一步研究其可靠性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验