Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ukom, Norwegian Healthcare Investigation Board, Stavanger, Norway.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269711. eCollection 2022.
Recently, increasing attention has been paid to team processes in peripartum care settings with the aim to improve fetomaternal outcomes. However, we have yet to understand how the perception of teamwork in peripartum care is shaped in a complex, multi-disciplinary environment.
The aim of this study was to approach the question using qualitative social-scientific methodology. The theoretical foundation of the study was that obstetric teamwork is the result of a balancing act in which multiple goal conflicts are continuously negotiated and managed right at the boundary of acceptable performance in a complex adaptive system. We explored this theory by gathering lived experiences of successful management of peripartum emergencies. Based on our analysis we generated an understanding of teamwork as a phenomenon emerging from interpersonal relationships, complex relations of power, and the enactment of current quality management practices.
Caregivers define teamwork through the quality of their collaboration, defined by respect and appreciation, open communication, role distribution, and shared experiences. However, teamwork also becomes the framework for negotiation of many conflicts that originated elsewhere. Power was the core theme that emerged in the analysis of our participants' narratives, which is in stark contrast to the otherwise promoted egalitarian rhetoric of team training. While our participants generally reverted to explanations based on their professional identities, traditions or cultures, interesting dynamics become visible when work is viewed through the power lens.
Our study paints the convoluted picture of a work environment with all its intricacies, constraints, interpersonal relations and hierarchical struggles that are much more representative of a complex system rather than the easily tractable environment that so many stakeholders would like healthcare practitioners to believe in. The issue of power emerged as a decisive factor in the social dynamics at the workplace, revealing hidden agendas in the teamwork discourse.
最近,人们越来越关注围产期保健环境中的团队流程,旨在改善母婴结局。然而,我们还需要了解在复杂的多学科环境中,围产期护理中的团队合作感知是如何形成的。
本研究旨在使用定性社会科学方法来解决这个问题。研究的理论基础是,产科团队合作是一种平衡行为的结果,在这种行为中,多个目标冲突在复杂自适应系统的可接受性能边界处不断协商和管理。我们通过收集围产期紧急情况成功管理的经验来探索这一理论。基于我们的分析,我们对团队合作作为一种从人际关系、复杂的权力关系以及当前质量管理实践的实施中出现的现象有了一定的理解。
护理人员通过协作的质量来定义团队合作,这种质量是由尊重和欣赏、开放的沟通、角色分配和共同的经验来定义的。然而,团队合作也成为了许多源自其他地方的冲突的谈判框架。权力是分析参与者叙述时出现的核心主题,这与团队培训中所倡导的平等主义言论形成鲜明对比。虽然我们的参与者通常会回归到基于他们的专业身份、传统或文化的解释,但当工作通过权力视角来看待时,有趣的动态就变得可见了。
我们的研究描绘了一个工作环境的错综复杂的画面,其中包括其所有的复杂性、约束、人际关系和等级斗争,这更能代表一个复杂的系统,而不是许多利益相关者希望医疗保健从业者相信的易于处理的环境。权力问题作为工作场所社会动态的决定性因素出现,揭示了团队合作话语中的隐藏议程。