• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科医疗保健评估工具:心理测量学证据综述。

Interdisciplinary Health Care Evaluation Instruments: A Review of Psychometric Evidence.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2022 Sep;45(3):223-234. doi: 10.1177/01632787211040859. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1177/01632787211040859
PMID:34409879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9446429/
Abstract

Teamwork among health care professionals has been found to improve patient outcomes and reduce burnout. Surveys from individual team members are often used to measure the effectiveness of teamwork performance, as they provide an efficient way to capture various constructs of teamwork. This allows evaluators to better understand team functioning, areas of strength, and to identify potential areas for improvement. However, the majority of published surveys are yet to be validated. We conducted a review of psychometric evidence to identify instruments frequently used in practice and identified in the literature. The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant articles, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria for full assessment. Seven surveys were validated and most frequently identified in the literature. This review aims to facilitate the selection of instruments that are most appropriate for research and clinical practice. More research is required to develop surveys that better reflect the current reality of teamwork in our evolving health system, including a greater consideration for patient as team members. Additionally, more research is needed to encompass an increasing development of team assessment tools.

摘要

医护人员之间的团队合作已被发现可以改善患者的预后并减少职业倦怠。通常使用个别团队成员的调查来衡量团队合作绩效的有效性,因为它们提供了一种高效的方式来捕捉团队合作的各种构建。这使评估者能够更好地了解团队的运作情况、优势领域,并确定潜在的改进领域。然而,大多数已发表的调查尚未得到验证。我们对心理测量学证据进行了审查,以确定在实践中经常使用并在文献中发现的工具。搜索的数据库包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO。排除重复项和不相关的文章后,有 15 篇文章符合全面评估的纳入标准。有 7 项调查得到了验证,并且在文献中最常被提及。本综述旨在促进选择最适合研究和临床实践的工具。需要进一步的研究来开发更好地反映我们不断发展的医疗系统中团队合作当前现实的调查,包括更多地考虑将患者作为团队成员。此外,还需要更多的研究来涵盖团队评估工具的日益发展。

相似文献

1
Interdisciplinary Health Care Evaluation Instruments: A Review of Psychometric Evidence.跨学科医疗保健评估工具:心理测量学证据综述。
Eval Health Prof. 2022 Sep;45(3):223-234. doi: 10.1177/01632787211040859. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
2
Measuring teamwork in health care settings: a review of survey instruments.医疗环境中团队合作的测量:调查工具综述
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):e16-30. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
A review of instruments to measure interprofessional team-based primary care.衡量跨专业团队初级保健的工具综述。
J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):423-32. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1154023. Epub 2016 May 21.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.测量被认为会影响初级保健质量改进成功的团队因素的工具:系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 14;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-20.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
Psychometric properties of instruments measuring quality and satisfaction in mental health: A systematic review.测量心理健康质量和满意度的工具的心理计量学特性:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Nov;74(11):2497-2510. doi: 10.1111/jan.13813. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool: a reflective tool to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork using Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation.跨学科管理工具实施的定性评估:一种通过结构化、促进式行动研究实施来增强跨学科团队合作的反思工具。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jul;23(4):437-48. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12173. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Assessing teamwork performance in obstetrics: A systematic search and review of validated tools.评估产科团队协作表现:对有效工具的系统检索与综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the collaborative practice assessment tool (CPAT) for assessing interprofessional education and collaborative practice among health practitioners and students.对印度尼西亚语版协作实践评估工具(CPAT)进行心理测量评估,以评估卫生从业人员和学生之间的跨专业教育与协作实践。
Narra J. 2024 Dec;4(3):e1106. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1106. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
2
An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Australian Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool.澳大利亚协作实践评估工具的心理计量特性评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302834. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Italian version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (I-AITCS II): a multiphase study of validity and reliability amongst healthcare providers.《跨专业团队协作评估量表II(意大利语版)》(I-AITCS II):医疗服务提供者有效性和可靠性的多阶段研究
Med Lav. 2018 Aug 28;109(4):316-324. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v109i4.7101.
2
Evaluation of interprofessional health care team communication simulation in geriatric palliative care.老年姑息治疗中跨专业医疗团队沟通模拟的评估
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2019 Jan-Mar;40(1):30-42. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2018.1505617. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
3
Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): Further Testing and Instrument Revision.
Reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the collaborative practice assessment tool: A pilot study.
台湾版协作实践评估工具的信效度:一项初步研究。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Apr 13;35(3):267-276. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_200_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
跨专业团队协作量表(AITCS)评估:进一步测试与量表修订
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018 Winter;38(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000193.
4
Examining the impacts of health literacy on healthcare costs. An evidence synthesis.审视健康素养对医疗成本的影响。一项证据综合分析。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2017 Nov;30(4):197-212. doi: 10.1177/0951484817733366. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Patient-centred care is a way of doing things: How healthcare employees conceptualize patient-centred care.以患者为中心的护理是一种做事方式:医疗保健员工如何概念化以患者为中心的护理。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):300-307. doi: 10.1111/hex.12615. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
6
Assessing teamwork performance in obstetrics: A systematic search and review of validated tools.评估产科团队协作表现:对有效工具的系统检索与综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Organizing for teamwork in healthcare: an alternative to team training?组织医疗团队合作:团队培训的替代方案?
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 May 15;31(3):347-362. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2016-0233.
8
Teamwork Assessment Tools in Obstetric Emergencies: A Systematic Review.产科急症中的团队协作评估工具:一项系统综述
Simul Healthc. 2017 Jun;12(3):165-176. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000210.
9
Understanding interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management for older adults living in communities: a concept analysis.理解社区中老年人慢性病管理背景下的跨专业合作:概念分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Jan;73(1):71-84. doi: 10.1111/jan.13162. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.