Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;23(21):6505-6515. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0176. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
To determine whether markers of healthy breast stroma are able to select a subgroup of patients at low risk of death or metastasis from patients considered at high risk according to routine markers of the tumor. Patients with ER/HER2 breast cancer were consecutively included for retrospective analysis. The contralateral parenchyma was segmented automatically on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), where upon the average of the top-10% late enhancement was calculated. This contralateral parenchymal enhancement (CPE) was analyzed with respect to routine prognostic models and molecular assays (Nottingham Prognostic Index, Dutch clinical chemotherapy-selection guidelines, 70-gene signature, and 21-gene recurrence score). CPE was split in tertiles and tested for overall and distant disease-free survival. CPE was adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics, as well as systemic therapy, using inverse probability weighting (IPW). Subanalyses were performed in patients at high risk according to prognostic models and molecular assays. Four-hundred-and-fifteen patients were included, constituting the same group in which the association between CPE and survival was discovered. Median follow-up was 85 months, 34/415(8%) patients succumbed. After IPW-adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics, patients with high CPE had significantly better overall survival than those with low CPE in groups at high risk according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index [HR (95% CI): 0.08 (0.00-0.40), < 0.001]; Dutch clinical guidelines [HR (95% CI): 0.22 (0.00-0.81), = 0.021]; and 21-gene recurrence score [HR (95% CI): 0.14 (0.00-0.84), = 0.030]. One group showed a trend [70-gene signature: HR (95% CI): 0.25 (0.00-1.02), = 0.054]. In patients at high risk based on the tumor, subgroups at relatively low risk were identified using pretreatment enhancement of the stroma on breast DCE-MRI. .
为了确定健康乳腺基质的标志物是否能够根据肿瘤的常规标志物,从被认为处于高风险的患者中选择死亡或转移风险较低的亚组患者。对连续纳入的 ER/HER2 乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析。在动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)上自动分割对侧实质,计算前 10%的晚期增强的平均值。对侧实质增强(CPE)与常规预后模型和分子检测(诺丁汉预后指数、荷兰临床化疗选择指南、70 基因标志物和 21 基因复发评分)进行分析。将 CPE 分为三分位并进行总生存和无远处疾病生存的测试。使用逆概率加权(IPW)调整 CPE 与患者和肿瘤特征以及全身治疗的关系。在根据预后模型和分子检测被认为处于高风险的患者中进行了亚组分析。共纳入 415 例患者,这些患者与发现 CPE 与生存之间的关联的患者相同。中位随访时间为 85 个月,34/415(8%)例患者死亡。在调整患者和肿瘤特征后,在根据诺丁汉预后指数[风险比(95%CI):0.08(0.00-0.40),<0.001]、荷兰临床指南[风险比(95%CI):0.22(0.00-0.81),=0.021]和 21 基因复发评分[风险比(95%CI):0.14(0.00-0.84),=0.030]被认为处于高风险的患者中,CPE 较高的患者总体生存情况明显优于 CPE 较低的患者。其中一组显示出一种趋势[70 基因标志物:风险比(95%CI):0.25(0.00-1.02),=0.054]。在基于肿瘤的高风险患者中,使用乳腺 DCE-MRI 上的基质预处理增强确定了相对低风险的亚组。