O'Cathail Sean M, Pokrovska Tzveta D, Maughan Timothy S, Fisher Kerry D, Seymour Leonard W, Hawkins Maria A
Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Oncol. 2017 Jul 24;7:153. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00153. eCollection 2017.
Oncolytic viruses and radiotherapy represent two diverse areas of cancer therapy, utilizing quite different treatment modalities and with non-overlapping cytotoxicity profiles. It is, therefore, an intriguing possibility to consider that oncolytic ("cancer-killing") viruses may act as cancer-selective radiosensitizers, enhancing the therapeutic consequences of radiation treatment on tumors while exerting minimal effects on normal tissue. There is a solid mechanistic basis for this potential synergy, with many viruses having developed strategies to inhibit cellular DNA repair pathways in order to protect themselves, during genome replication, from unwanted interference by cell processes that are normally triggered by DNA damage. Exploiting these abilities to inhibit cellular DNA repair following damage by therapeutic irradiation may well augment the anticancer potency of the approach. In this review, we focus on oncolytic adenovirus, the most widely developed and best understood oncolytic virus, and explore its various mechanisms for modulating cellular DNA repair pathways. The most obvious effects of the various adenovirus serotypes are to interfere with activity of the MRE11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex, temporally one of the first sensors of double-stranded DNA damage, and inhibition of DNA ligase IV, a central repair enzyme for healing double-stranded breaks by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). There have been several preclinical and clinical studies of this approach and we assess the current state of progress. In addition, oncolytic viruses provide the option to promote a localized proinflammatory response, both by mediating immunogenic death of cancer cells by oncosis and also by encoding and expressing proinflammatory biologics within the tumor microenvironment. Both of these approaches provide exciting potential to augment the known immunological consequences of radiotherapy, aiming to develop systems capable of creating a systemic anticancer immune response following localized tumor treatment.
溶瘤病毒和放射疗法是癌症治疗的两个不同领域,它们采用截然不同的治疗方式,且细胞毒性谱不重叠。因此,一个有趣的可能性是,溶瘤(“杀癌”)病毒可能作为癌症选择性放射增敏剂,增强放射治疗对肿瘤的治疗效果,同时对正常组织产生最小影响。这种潜在协同作用有坚实的机制基础,许多病毒已开发出抑制细胞DNA修复途径的策略,以便在基因组复制过程中保护自身免受通常由DNA损伤触发的细胞过程的不必要干扰。利用这些能力在治疗性照射造成损伤后抑制细胞DNA修复,很可能会增强该方法的抗癌效力。在本综述中,我们聚焦于溶瘤腺病毒,这是开发最广泛且理解最深入的溶瘤病毒,并探讨其调节细胞DNA修复途径的各种机制。各种腺病毒血清型最明显的作用是干扰MRE11-Rad50-Nbs1复合物的活性,该复合物是双链DNA损伤的首批传感器之一,同时抑制DNA连接酶IV,它是通过非同源末端连接(NHEJ)修复双链断裂的核心修复酶。已经有多项关于该方法的临床前和临床研究,我们评估了当前的进展状况。此外,溶瘤病毒提供了促进局部促炎反应的选择,既可以通过瘤亡介导癌细胞的免疫原性死亡,也可以通过在肿瘤微环境中编码和表达促炎生物制剂来实现。这两种方法都为增强放疗已知的免疫后果提供了令人兴奋的潜力,旨在开发能够在局部肿瘤治疗后产生全身抗癌免疫反应的系统。