• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.解决投票保密问题的竞选动员信息对投票率的影响:一项复制实验。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0182199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182199. eCollection 2017.
2
The voting experience and beliefs about ballot secrecy.投票体验和对选票保密性的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0209765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209765. eCollection 2019.
3
Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share.普遍的邮寄选票对党派投票率或选票份额没有影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14052-14056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007249117. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail.2020 年鼓励邮寄投票的实地试验结果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021022118.
5
Walking the walk? Experiments on the effect of pledging to vote on youth turnout.践行承诺?关于投票承诺对青年投票率影响的实验。
PLoS One. 2018 May 29;13(5):e0197066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197066. eCollection 2018.
6
Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.对 2023 年土耳其总统选举的法医分析显示,偏远地区的选票出现极端波动。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0293239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293239. eCollection 2023.
7
The participatory and partisan impacts of mandatory vote-by-mail.强制邮寄投票的参与性和党派性影响。
Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 26;6(35):eabc7685. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc7685. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election.2020 年选举错误信息与 2021 年佐治亚州决选投票中的线上参与度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 23;119(34):e2115900119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115900119. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment.拉票活动能提高选民投票率吗?一项实地实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 14;96(19):10939-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10939.
10
The Grassroots of Grass: Cannabis Legalization Ballot Initiative Campaign Contributions and Outcomes, 2004-2016.草根大麻:2004-2016 年大麻合法化投票倡议运动捐款和结果。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Feb 1;45(1):73-109. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7893579.

引用本文的文献

1
Walking the walk? Experiments on the effect of pledging to vote on youth turnout.践行承诺?关于投票承诺对青年投票率影响的实验。
PLoS One. 2018 May 29;13(5):e0197066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197066. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The voting experience and beliefs about ballot secrecy.投票体验和对选票保密性的看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0209765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209765. eCollection 2019.

解决投票保密问题的竞选动员信息对投票率的影响:一项复制实验。

The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.

作者信息

Gerber Alan S, Huber Gregory A, Fang Albert H, Reardon Catlan E

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0182199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182199. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0182199
PMID:28793311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5549925/
Abstract

Given the persistence of public doubts about the integrity of ballot secrecy, which depress turnout, two prior experiments have shown precise evidence that both official governmental and unofficial mobilization campaigns providing assurances about ballot secrecy increase turnout among recently registered nonvoters. To assess whether these findings replicate in other political settings, we describe a replication experiment where a non-governmental, non-partisan mobilization campaign sent similar treatment mailings containing assurances about ballot secrecy protections to recently registered nonvoters during the 2014 general election in Mississippi. We find that sending this mailer has no effect on turnout rates in this setting, which is characterized by an unusually low baseline turnout rate. These results are consistent with past research concluding that nonpartisan Get Out The Vote (GOTV) mail has very weak effects among very low turnout propensity registrants, and suggest that there are heterogeneous effects of ballot secrecy treatments associated with subjects' characteristics and the electoral context.

摘要

鉴于公众对选票保密性的完整性一直存在疑虑,这压低了投票率,此前的两项实验已显示出确切证据,即官方政府和非官方动员活动提供的关于选票保密的保证都会提高最近登记的未投票者的投票率。为了评估这些发现是否能在其他政治环境中得到复制,我们描述了一项复制实验,在2014年密西西比州的大选中,一个非政府、无党派的动员活动向最近登记的未投票者发送了类似的包含选票保密保护保证的宣传邮件。我们发现,在这种以异常低的基线投票率为特征的环境中,发送此邮件对投票率没有影响。这些结果与过去的研究一致,该研究得出结论,无党派的投票动员邮件对投票倾向极低的登记者影响非常微弱,并表明与选票保密处理相关的存在异质性影响,这与受试者的特征和选举背景有关。