• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我原以为我们会被 spoon-fed(被填鸭式教育)”:斯威士兰社区共同研究者对参与式健康研究中个体赋权的看法。

'I was thinking we would be spoon-fed': Community co-researchers' perceptions of individual empowerment in participatory health research in Swaziland.

机构信息

a School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (Jean Hailes Research Unit) , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2018 Oct;13(10):1441-1453. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1363901. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2017.1363901
PMID:28793832
Abstract

Empowerment is an influential concept in global public health. Current theoretical models, which were developed in resource-rich countries, conceptualise individual-level empowerment as a process (or outcome) of developing positive self-perceptions, critical thinking expertise and new behaviours. They neglect the social and structural aspects that were central to early conceptualisations of empowerment, and may be culturally biased. My aim was to elucidate lay-people in Swaziland's perspectives about individual-level empowerment. Twenty-one focus group discussions with lay-community 'co-researchers' were collected longitudinally over 14 months of a participatory health research process. Findings generated using interpretive analysis of epiphanies highlighted the salience of socio-historic context, in limiting the co-researchers' expectations and experiences, and shaping their perceptions, of empowerment. The findings demonstrate that the co-researchers perceived: working independently and collaboratively; developing new perceptions of others, and technical (health and research) expertise; using expertise to take action; and accessing material resources were important aspects of empowerment. They indicate that individual-level empowerment models utilised in global public health might be enhanced by incorporating social and structural dimensions. These dimensions are needed to capture the relations and interactions which mediate socially excluded people's agency to access the social and material resources needed to secure their right to health.

摘要

赋权是全球公共卫生领域的一个重要概念。当前的理论模型是在资源丰富的国家发展起来的,它们将个体层面的赋权概念化为发展积极的自我认知、批判性思维专业知识和新行为的过程(或结果)。这些模型忽视了赋权早期概念化的核心社会和结构方面,并且可能存在文化偏见。我的目的是阐明斯威士兰民众对个体层面赋权的看法。在参与式健康研究过程的 14 个月中,我通过 21 次与基层社区“共同研究者”进行的焦点小组讨论,收集了纵向数据。使用对顿悟的解释性分析生成的研究结果突出了社会历史背景的重要性,这限制了共同研究者的期望和经验,并塑造了他们对赋权的看法。研究结果表明,共同研究者认为:独立和合作工作;对他人和技术(健康和研究)专业知识有新的认识;利用专业知识采取行动;以及获取物质资源是赋权的重要方面。这些结果表明,在全球公共卫生中使用的个体层面赋权模型可以通过纳入社会和结构维度来得到加强。这些维度对于捕捉中介关系和相互作用是必要的,这些关系和相互作用介导了社会排斥者获得社会和物质资源的代理权,以确保他们的健康权。

相似文献

1
'I was thinking we would be spoon-fed': Community co-researchers' perceptions of individual empowerment in participatory health research in Swaziland.“我原以为我们会被 spoon-fed(被填鸭式教育)”:斯威士兰社区共同研究者对参与式健康研究中个体赋权的看法。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Oct;13(10):1441-1453. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1363901. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
Community participation in health research: an ethnography from rural Swaziland.社区参与健康研究:来自斯威士兰农村的民族志。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):e59-e69. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day121.
3
Economic empowerment and AIDS-related stigma in rural Kenya: a double-edged sword?肯尼亚农村的经济赋权与艾滋病污名化:一把双刃剑?
Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(7):851-65. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2013.789127. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
Cultural and gender issues related to HIV/AIDS prevention in rural Swaziland: a focus group analysis.斯威士兰农村地区与艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防相关的文化和性别问题:焦点小组分析
Health Care Women Int. 2002 Feb;23(2):173-84. doi: 10.1080/073993302753429040.
5
Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe.南非和津巴布韦社区成员及研究人员在一个生态健康项目中的社区参与经历。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 13;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0236-3.
6
Participatory research with youth: idealising safe social spaces or building transformative links in difficult environments?参与式研究与青年:在困难环境中理想化安全的社会空间还是建立变革性联系?
J Health Psychol. 2014 Jan;19(1):184-92. doi: 10.1177/1359105313500258. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
7
Australian health promotion practitioners' perceptions on evaluation of empowerment and participation.澳大利亚健康促进从业者对赋权和参与评估的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Mar;29(1):70-80. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das046. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
8
Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知:二元访谈分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
Empowering members of a rural southern community in Nigeria to plan to take action to prevent maternal mortality: A participatory action research project.赋予尼日利亚南部农村社区成员权力,以计划采取行动预防产妇死亡:一项参与式行动研究项目。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):e1600-e1611. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14244. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
10
Ethical Research Practice or Undue Influence? Symbolic Power in Community- and Individual-Level Informed Consent Processes in Community-Based Participatory Research in Swaziland.道德研究实践还是不当影响?斯威士兰基于社区的参与性研究中社区和个体层面知情同意过程中的象征性权力
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):311-322. doi: 10.1177/1556264618761268. Epub 2018 Mar 13.