Suppr超能文献

社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知:二元访谈分析

Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.

作者信息

Paradiso de Sayu Rebecca, Chanmugam Amy

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Cooperative Extension, Wisconsin, USA

The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Abstract

Although the concept of empowerment is a key principle of community-based participatory research (CBPR), little is known about how academic and community partners perceive empowerment during a CBPR process. CBPR partners' perceptions of the process were explored using semi-structured interviews with both partners in 10 CBPR partnerships that had completed projects addressing social determinants of health. Dyadic interview analysis was employed to understand dynamics within and across partnerships. Five partnerships showed no differences in perceptions of empowerment. Four had minor discrepancies. Only one partnership varied considerably between partners, where the community partner perceived less empowerment regarding determining the study topic and overall control, influence, and respect throughout the process. This article discusses implications of findings for CBPR. Evaluating partners' perceived empowerment throughout a CBPR project might reveal areas to adjust, as not all projects with quantifiably successful outcomes involve processes that are successful in terms of empowerment.

摘要

尽管赋权概念是基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)的关键原则,但对于学术伙伴和社区伙伴在CBPR过程中如何看待赋权却知之甚少。通过对10个已完成解决健康社会决定因素项目的CBPR合作关系中的双方进行半结构化访谈,探讨了CBPR伙伴对该过程的看法。采用二元访谈分析来理解合作关系内部和之间的动态。五个合作关系在赋权认知上没有差异。四个存在细微差异。只有一个合作关系中双方差异很大,社区伙伴在确定研究主题以及整个过程中的总体控制、影响力和尊重方面感到赋权较少。本文讨论了研究结果对CBPR的影响。在整个CBPR项目中评估伙伴的感知赋权可能会揭示需要调整的领域,因为并非所有在数量上取得成功结果的项目在赋权方面的过程都是成功的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验