• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类风湿关节炎患者继续使用SB4或从对照药依那西普转换为SB4的长期疗效及安全性。

Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4.

作者信息

Emery Paul, Vencovský Jiří, Sylwestrzak Anna, Leszczyński Piotr, Porawska Wieslawa, Stasiuk Barbara, Hilt Joanna, Mosterova Zdenka, Cheong Soo Yeon, Ghil Jeehoon

机构信息

Arthritis Research, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov 13;76(12):1986-1991. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591.

DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591
PMID:28794078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5705842/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

SB4 (Benepali, Brenzys) is a biosimilar of reference etanercept (ETN). In a randomised, double-blind, 52-week study, SB4 demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The open-label extension period evaluated long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity when continuing SB4 versus switching from ETN to SB4.

METHODS

In the randomised, double-blind phase, patients received weekly subcutaneous administration of 50 mg SB4 or ETN with background methotrexate for up to 52 weeks. Patients in the Czech Republic and Poland who completed the 52-week visit were enrolled in the open-label extension period and received SB4 for 48 additional weeks. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 100.

RESULTS

Of 245 patients entering the extension period, 126 continued to receive SB4 (SB4/SB4) and 119 switched to SB4 (ETN/SB4). American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates were sustained and comparable between SB4/SB4 and ETN/SB4 with ACR20 response rates at week 100 of 77.9% and 79.1%, respectively. Other efficacy results, including radiographic progression, were also comparable between the groups. After week 52, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 47.6% (SB4/SB4) and 48.7% (ETN/SB4); one patient/group developed non-neutralising antidrug antibodies. No cases of active tuberculosis or injection-site reactions were reported during the extension period. One patient (SB4/SB4) died of hepatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

SB4 was effective and well tolerated over 2 years in patients with RA. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were comparable between the SB4/SB4 and ETN/SB4 groups, showing no risk associated with switching patients from ETN to SB4.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01895309; 2012-005026-30.

摘要

目的

SB4(Benepali、Brenzys)是参比依那西普(ETN)的生物类似药。在一项随机、双盲、为期52周的研究中,SB4在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中显示出与ETN相当的疗效和安全性。开放标签延长期评估了持续使用SB4与从ETN转换为SB4时的长期疗效、安全性和免疫原性。

方法

在随机、双盲阶段,患者每周皮下注射50mg SB4或ETN,并联合背景甲氨蝶呤,持续长达52周。在捷克共和国和波兰完成52周访视的患者进入开放标签延长期,再接受48周的SB4治疗。评估至第100周时的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。

结果

进入延长期的245例患者中,126例继续接受SB4治疗(SB4/SB4组),119例转换为SB4治疗(ETN/SB4组)。美国风湿病学会(ACR)反应率得以维持,SB4/SB4组和ETN/SB4组相当,第100周时ACR20反应率分别为77.9%和79.1%。其他疗效结果,包括影像学进展,在两组间也相当。52周后,治疗中出现的不良事件发生率在SB4/SB4组为47.6%,在ETN/SB4组为48.7%;每组各有1例患者产生非中和性抗药抗体。延长期内未报告活动性结核或注射部位反应病例。1例患者(SB4/SB4组)死于肝癌。

结论

SB4在RA患者中2年的治疗效果良好且耐受性佳。SB4/SB4组和ETN/SB4组在疗效、安全性和免疫原性方面相当,表明将患者从ETN转换为SB4无风险。

试验注册号

NCT01895309;2012-005026-30。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/29192dce2eb3/annrheumdis-2017-211591f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/0d94b78290dc/annrheumdis-2017-211591f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/0cfb82ddc72c/annrheumdis-2017-211591f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/29192dce2eb3/annrheumdis-2017-211591f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/0d94b78290dc/annrheumdis-2017-211591f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/0cfb82ddc72c/annrheumdis-2017-211591f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a92f/5705842/29192dce2eb3/annrheumdis-2017-211591f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4.类风湿关节炎患者继续使用SB4或从对照药依那西普转换为SB4的长期疗效及安全性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov 13;76(12):1986-1991. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591.
2
A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.一项III期随机、双盲、平行组研究,在尽管接受甲氨蝶呤治疗但仍患有活动性类风湿关节炎的患者中,将SB4与依那西普参比产品进行比较。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
3
52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中比较SB4与参比药物依那西普的3期随机研究的52周结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Dec 1;56(12):2093-2101. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex269.
4
Long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on an etanercept biosimilar (LBEC0101) or switching from reference etanercept to LBEC0101: an open-label extension of a phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.在继续接受依那西普生物类似药(LBEC0101)或从参照依那西普转换为 LBEC0101 的类风湿关节炎患者中的长期疗效、安全性和免疫原性:一项 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、平行组研究的开放性扩展。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 21;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1910-2.
5
Post-switch Effectiveness of Etanercept Biosimilar Versus Continued Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Stable Disease: A Prospective Multinational Observational Study.依那西普生物类似药转换治疗与继续使用依那西普治疗对病情稳定的类风湿关节炎患者的疗效:一项前瞻性多国观察性研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):5259-5273. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02303-1. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
6
Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study.从参照依那西普转换为依那西普生物类似药 SDZ ETN 并不影响中重度类风湿关节炎患者依那西普的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:III 期、随机、双盲 EQUIRA 研究的 48 周结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x.
7
A phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group trial comparing safety and efficacy of HD203, with innovator etanercept, in combination with methotrexate, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the HERA study.一项比较 HD203 联合甲氨蝶呤与依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤在类风湿关节炎患者中的安全性和疗效的 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、阳性对照、平行分组临床试验:HERA 研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):65-71. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207613. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study.与参比依那西普相比,GP2015(一种依那西普生物类似药)在中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性及免疫原性:III期比较性、随机、双盲EQUIRA研究的24周结果
RMD Open. 2018 Nov 14;4(2):e000757. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000757. eCollection 2018.
9
A randomized phase l pharmacokinetic study comparing SB4 and etanercept reference product (Enbrel®) in healthy subjects.一项在健康受试者中比较SB4与依那西普参比产品(恩利®)的随机I期药代动力学研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;82(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12929. Epub 2016 May 2.
10
Phase III, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study to evaluate the similarities between LBEC0101 and etanercept reference product in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate.三期、多中心、双盲、随机、平行分组研究,旨在评估 LBEC0101 与依那西普参比制剂在甲氨蝶呤治疗应答不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性方面的相似性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;77(4):488-494. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212172. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Persistence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Before and After Etanercept Biosimilar Introduction: A Nationwide Australian Real-World Study.依那西普生物类似药引入前后类风湿关节炎的治疗持续性:一项澳大利亚全国性真实世界研究
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00577-8.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, or Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with GP2015, an Etanercept Biosimilar: Results from Two Phase III Studies (EGALITY and EQUIRA).用依那西普生物类似药 GP2015 治疗的类风湿关节炎、银屑病或银屑病关节炎患者的患者报告结局指标:两项 III 期研究(EGALITY 和 EQUIRA)的结果
Drugs R D. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00507-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.从原研英夫利昔单抗转换为生物类似药 CT-P13 与继续使用原研英夫利昔单抗维持治疗(NOR-SWITCH):一项 52 周、随机、双盲、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2304-2316. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30068-5. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry.一项针对 802 例炎症性关节炎患者的全国性非医学性从原研英夫利昔单抗转换为生物类似药 CT-P13 的研究:DANBIO 注册研究的 1 年临床结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1426-1431. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210742. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars compared with the biologic etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
比较生物类似药与依那西普生物制剂在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;13(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02715-w.
4
Safety outcomes when switching between biosimilars and reference biologics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生物类似药与参照生物制品之间转换时的安全性结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292231. eCollection 2023.
5
Outcomes following switching from etanercept originator to etanercept biosimilar in 1024 patients with RA: a matched-analysis of the BSRBR-RA.1024例类风湿关节炎患者从原研依那西普转换为依那西普生物类似药后的结局:英国风湿病学会生物制剂注册登记处类风湿关节炎匹配分析
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Aug 1;63(8):2082-2092. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead470.
6
Impact of switching between reference biologics and biosimilars of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎中肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的参照生物制剂和生物类似药之间转换的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40222-5.
7
Therapeutic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药与参照生物药的等效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15872.
8
Etanercept originator versus etanercept biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as a first biologic: results from the BSRBR-RA.依那西普原研药与依那西普生物类似药治疗类风湿关节炎作为一线生物制剂的比较:来自 BSRBR-RA 的结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Dec 1;62(12):3849-3857. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead127.
9
Safety and Effectiveness of Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 for Rheumatic Diseases in South Korea: Real-World Post-marketing Surveillance Data.韩国依那西普生物类似药SB4用于治疗风湿性疾病的安全性和有效性:真实世界上市后监测数据
Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Apr;10(2):329-341. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00515-z. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
10
TNF-alpha inhibitors biosimilar use in France: a nationwide population-based study using the French National Health Data System.TNF-α 抑制剂生物类似药在法国的使用:一项利用法国国家健康数据系统的全国性基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 15;12(1):19569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24050-7.
Evaluation of the structural, physicochemical, and biological characteristics of SB4, a biosimilar of etanercept.评估依那西普生物类似药SB4的结构、物理化学和生物学特性。
MAbs. 2016 Aug-Sep;8(6):1136-55. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1193659. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study.CT-P13(生物类似药英夫利昔单抗)在类风湿性关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:在PLANETRA扩展研究中从参比英夫利昔单抗转换为CT-P13与继续使用CT-P13的比较
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):355-363. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208786. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
5
Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension study.强直性脊柱炎患者从参比英夫利昔单抗转换为CT-P13与继续使用CT-P13的疗效及安全性比较:来自PLANETAS扩展研究的102周数据
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):346-354. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208783. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
6
A randomized phase l pharmacokinetic study comparing SB4 and etanercept reference product (Enbrel®) in healthy subjects.一项在健康受试者中比较SB4与依那西普参比产品(恩利®)的随机I期药代动力学研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;82(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12929. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes from the Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.加拿大甲氨蝶呤和依那西普治疗类风湿关节炎患者疗效研究的两年影像学及临床结果
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):327-34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev338. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.一项III期随机、双盲、平行组研究,在尽管接受甲氨蝶呤治疗但仍患有活动性类风湿关节炎的患者中,将SB4与依那西普参比产品进行比较。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Etanercept: a review of its use in autoimmune inflammatory diseases.依那西普:在自身免疫性炎症性疾病中的应用评价。
Drugs. 2014 Aug;74(12):1379-410. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0258-9.
10
Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in a 5-year extension study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.评估依那西普在类风湿关节炎患者 5 年扩展研究中的长期安全性和疗效。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2):238-47. Epub 2011 Apr 19.