Suppr超能文献

生物类似药与参照生物制品之间转换时的安全性结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety outcomes when switching between biosimilars and reference biologics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.

Division of Biometrics VIII, Office of Biostatistics, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292231. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Biosimilars are increasingly available for the treatment of many serious disorders, however some concerns persist about switching a patient to a biosimilar whose condition is stable while on the reference biologic. Randomized controlled studies and extension studies with a switch treatment period (STP) to or from a biosimilar and its reference biologic were identified from publicly available information maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These findings were augmented with data from peer reviewed publications containing information not captured in FDA reviews. Forty-four STPs were identified from 31 unique studies for 21 different biosimilars. Data were extracted and synthesized following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the overall risk difference across studies. A total of 5,252 patients who were switched to or from a biosimilar and its reference biologic were identified. Safety data including deaths, serious adverse events, and treatment discontinuation showed an overall risk difference (95% CI) of -0.00 (-0.00, 0.00), 0.00 (-0.01, 0.01), -0.00 (-0.01, 0.00) across STPs, respectively. Immunogenicity data showed similar incidence of anti-drug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies in patients within a STP who were switched to or from a biosimilar to its reference biologic and patients who were not switched. Immune related adverse events such as anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity reactions, and injections site reactions were similar in switched and non-switched patients. This first systematic review using statistical methods to address the risk of switching patients between reference biologics and biosimilars finds no difference in the safety profiles or immunogenicity rates in patients who were switched and those who remained on a reference biologic or a biosimilar.

摘要

生物类似药在治疗许多严重疾病方面的应用日益增多,但人们仍然对在参考生物制剂治疗稳定的患者中切换至生物类似药存在一些担忧。本研究从美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)公开信息中确定了随机对照研究和扩展研究,并进行了切换治疗期(STP)至或来自生物类似药及其参考生物制剂的研究。这些发现通过包含未在 FDA 审查中捕获的信息的同行评审出版物中的数据进行了补充。从 31 项独特的研究中确定了 44 个 STP,涉及 21 种不同的生物类似药。根据 PRISMA 指南提取和综合数据。进行荟萃分析以估计研究间的总体风险差异。总共确定了 5252 名从生物类似药及其参考生物制剂切换的患者。安全性数据包括死亡、严重不良事件和治疗中止,在整个 STP 中显示出总体风险差异(95%CI)为-0.00(-0.00,0.00)、0.00(-0.01,0.01)、-0.00(-0.01,0.00)。免疫原性数据显示,在 STP 内切换至或来自生物类似药及其参考生物制剂的患者和未切换的患者中,抗药物抗体和中和抗体的发生率相似。在切换和未切换的患者中,免疫相关不良事件如过敏反应、过敏反应和注射部位反应相似。本研究首次使用统计方法系统地评估了在参考生物制剂和生物类似药之间切换患者的风险,发现切换患者和继续使用参考生物制剂或生物类似药的患者在安全性特征或免疫原性率方面没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d76b/10547155/63ed598d77b3/pone.0292231.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验