• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较生物类似药与依那西普生物制剂在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars compared with the biologic etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Medical Sciences Program, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, 70.910-900, Brazil.

Program of Evidence for Health Policy and Technologies, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation- Fiocruz Brasília, DF, 70.910-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;13(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02715-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02715-w
PMID:39605094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11600673/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biosimilar etanercept presents itself as an innovative therapeutic opportunity for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, however, its efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in relation to the reference biological agent for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is still questioned. With this in mind, this study aimed to verify the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the use of the biosimilar etanercept in relation to the reference biologic in patients over 18 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the parameters of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) selecting only Phase III randomized clinical trials. The search strategy was constructed with the MeSH terms "Etanercept", "Biological Products", "Arthritis, Rheumatoid", "Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals" and was performed in Medline via PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO and Lilacs in January 2023. The analysis measures were relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. The statistical analysis for preparing meta-analyses was developed by the Review Manager 5.1.4 software.

RESULTS

This systematic review selected 6 eligible studies with a sample population of n = 2355. The main efficacy outcomes showed that both drugs did not present statistically significant differences in ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses within 6 months (RR 1.00; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.07; RR 1.09; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.26; RR 1.04; 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.31, respectively), with I ranging from 55 to 63% and 0.04 ≤ P ≥ 0.08. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, and serious adverse events were not statistically significant. Regarding immunogenicity, only 5.4% of the ADA-positive biosimilar group had positive neutralizing antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, this review found that biosimilar etanercept had efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity similar to those for the biological reference.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO platform under number CRD42020166610.

摘要

背景

生物类似物依那西普为炎症性和自身免疫性疾病提供了一种创新性的治疗机会,然而,其在治疗类风湿关节炎方面相对于参考生物制剂的疗效、安全性和免疫原性仍存在争议。考虑到这一点,本研究旨在验证生物类似物依那西普在 18 岁以上类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性是否与参考生物制剂相当。

方法

按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)参数进行系统评价和荟萃分析,仅选择 III 期随机临床试验。检索策略使用 MeSH 术语“Etanercept”、“Biological Products”、“Arthritis, Rheumatoid”、“Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals”,通过 PubMed 中的 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、EBSCO 和 Lilacs 于 2023 年 1 月进行检索。分析指标为二分类数据的相对风险(RR)和连续数据的均数差(MD)。准备荟萃分析的统计分析由 Review Manager 5.1.4 软件完成。

结果

本系统评价共纳入 6 项符合条件的研究,样本量为 n=2355。主要疗效结局显示,两种药物在 6 个月内 ACR20、ACR50 和 ACR70 反应方面均无统计学差异(RR 1.00;95%CI=0.94 至 1.07;RR 1.09;95%CI=0.94 至 1.26;RR 1.04;95%CI=0.82 至 1.31),I ²值为 55%至 63%,0.04≤P≥0.08。不良事件多为轻度或中度,严重不良事件无统计学意义。关于免疫原性,只有 5.4%的 ADA 阳性生物类似物组出现了中和抗体阳性。

结论

因此,本综述发现,生物类似物依那西普在疗效、安全性和免疫原性方面与参考生物制剂相似。

系统评价注册

本系统评价在 PROSPERO 平台上以编号 CRD42020166610 进行注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/048f24e23e5f/13643_2024_2715_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/5f269160890c/13643_2024_2715_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/cf2bdf6c14b4/13643_2024_2715_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/52aca6f2a70b/13643_2024_2715_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/048f24e23e5f/13643_2024_2715_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/5f269160890c/13643_2024_2715_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/cf2bdf6c14b4/13643_2024_2715_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/52aca6f2a70b/13643_2024_2715_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953c/11600673/048f24e23e5f/13643_2024_2715_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars compared with the biologic etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较生物类似药与依那西普生物制剂在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;13(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02715-w.
2
Therapeutic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药与参照生物药的等效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15872.
3
Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study.从参照依那西普转换为依那西普生物类似药 SDZ ETN 并不影响中重度类风湿关节炎患者依那西普的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:III 期、随机、双盲 EQUIRA 研究的 48 周结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x.
4
Equivalence and switching between biosimilars and reference molecules in rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎中生物类似药与参照药物之间的等效性及转换:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 17;10(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01754-x.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and their biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis having an insufficient response to methotrexate : A network meta-analysis.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂及其生物类似药在对甲氨蝶呤反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;82(3):248-255. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-01041-z. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on an etanercept biosimilar (LBEC0101) or switching from reference etanercept to LBEC0101: an open-label extension of a phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.在继续接受依那西普生物类似药(LBEC0101)或从参照依那西普转换为 LBEC0101 的类风湿关节炎患者中的长期疗效、安全性和免疫原性:一项 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、平行组研究的开放性扩展。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 21;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1910-2.
7
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于初治类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 8;5(5):CD012657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012657.
8
Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎患者中依那西普生物类似药与参照生物制剂的疗效、安全性及免疫原性:一项荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1089272. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1089272. eCollection 2023.
9
Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).生物制剂或托法替布单药治疗传统抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗失败的类风湿关节炎患者:一项Cochrane系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD012437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012437.
10
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于对甲氨蝶呤或其他传统改善病情抗风湿药物反应不完全的类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD012183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012183.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of biosimilar use on healthcare utilization among new users of etanercept for inflammatory arthritis: a population-based regression discontinuity analysis.生物类似药使用对炎症性关节炎新使用依那西普患者医疗保健利用的影响:基于人群的断点回归分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Apr 11;45:101058. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101058. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
2
Switch from reference etanercept to SDZ ETN, an etanercept biosimilar, does not impact efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week results from the phase III, randomized, double-blind EQUIRA study.从参照依那西普转换为依那西普生物类似药 SDZ ETN 并不影响中重度类风湿关节炎患者依那西普的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:III 期、随机、双盲 EQUIRA 研究的 48 周结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 28;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1907-x.
3
Long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on an etanercept biosimilar (LBEC0101) or switching from reference etanercept to LBEC0101: an open-label extension of a phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.
在继续接受依那西普生物类似药(LBEC0101)或从参照依那西普转换为 LBEC0101 的类风湿关节炎患者中的长期疗效、安全性和免疫原性:一项 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、平行组研究的开放性扩展。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 21;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1910-2.
4
2017 recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.2017 年巴西风湿病学会类风湿关节炎药物治疗推荐。
Adv Rheumatol. 2018 May 24;58(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42358-018-0005-0.
5
Repeated switches between reference product etanercept and biosimilar do not affect disease activity or retention rate of etanercept over 24 months - a cohort study with historical controls.与参比产品依那西普和生物类似药之间的反复转换在24个月内不影响依那西普的疾病活动或留存率——一项采用历史对照的队列研究。
Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Jul;86(4):529-530. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study.与参比依那西普相比,GP2015(一种依那西普生物类似药)在中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效、安全性及免疫原性:III期比较性、随机、双盲EQUIRA研究的24周结果
RMD Open. 2018 Nov 14;4(2):e000757. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000757. eCollection 2018.
7
Open-Label, Non-Mandatory Transitioning From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4: Six-Month Results From a Controlled Cohort Study.开放性、非强制性由依那西普原研药转换为生物类似药 SB4:一项对照队列研究的 6 个月结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;70(9):1408-1418. doi: 10.1002/art.40516. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
8
Phase III, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study to evaluate the similarities between LBEC0101 and etanercept reference product in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate.三期、多中心、双盲、随机、平行分组研究,旨在评估 LBEC0101 与依那西普参比制剂在甲氨蝶呤治疗应答不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性方面的相似性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;77(4):488-494. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212172. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中比较SB4与参比药物依那西普的3期随机研究的52周结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Dec 1;56(12):2093-2101. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex269.
10
Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4.类风湿关节炎患者继续使用SB4或从对照药依那西普转换为SB4的长期疗效及安全性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov 13;76(12):1986-1991. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591.