Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Institute for Genetics Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), and University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 9;7(1):7629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07883-5.
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) by repeated brief cycles of limb ischemia/reperfusion reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. In left ventricular (LV) biopsies from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), only the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 was associated with RIPC's cardioprotection. We have now used an unbiased, non-hypothesis-driven proteomics and phosphoproteomics approach to analyze LV biopsies from patients undergoing CABG and from pigs undergoing coronary occlusion/reperfusion without (sham) and with RIPC. False discovery rate-based statistics identified a higher prostaglandin reductase 2 expression at early reperfusion with RIPC than with sham in patients. In pigs, the phosphorylation of 116 proteins was different between baseline and early reperfusion with RIPC and/or with sham. The identified proteins were not identical for patients and pigs, but in-silico pathway analysis of proteins with ≥2-fold higher expression/phosphorylation at early reperfusion with RIPC in comparison to sham revealed a relation to mitochondria and cytoskeleton in both species. Apart from limitations of the proteomics analysis per se, the small cohorts, the sampling/sample processing and the number of uncharacterized/unverifiable porcine proteins may have contributed to this largely unsatisfactory result.
远程缺血预处理(RIPC)通过反复短暂的肢体缺血/再灌注循环减轻心肌缺血/再灌注损伤。在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者的左心室(LV)活检中,只有信号转导子和转录激活子 5 的激活与 RIPC 的心脏保护作用相关。我们现在使用了一种无偏见的、非假设驱动的蛋白质组学和磷酸蛋白质组学方法来分析接受 CABG 的患者和接受冠状动脉闭塞/再灌注的猪的 LV 活检,这些猪没有(假手术)和有 RIPC。基于错误发现率的统计学分析表明,与假手术相比,接受 RIPC 的患者在早期再灌注时前列腺素还原酶 2 的表达更高。在猪中,基线和早期再灌注时 RIPC 和/或假手术之间有 116 种蛋白质的磷酸化不同。在患者和猪中,鉴定出的蛋白质并不相同,但在早期再灌注时与假手术相比,蛋白质的表达/磷酸化增加了 2 倍以上的蛋白质的计算机途径分析显示,在两种物种中与线粒体和细胞骨架有关。除了蛋白质组学分析本身的限制、小队列、采样/样品处理以及未表征/不可验证的猪蛋白质数量之外,这在很大程度上可能导致了结果不尽如人意。