Davey Adam, Johansson Lennarth, Malmberg Bo, Sundström Gerdt
Polisher Research Institute, 1425 Horsham Road, North Wales, PA 19454-1320 USA.
Socialstyrelsen, 10630 Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Ageing. 2006 Feb 16;3(1):34-40. doi: 10.1007/s10433-006-0020-6. eCollection 2006 Mar.
This study aimed to investigate whether contraction in services has led to inequitable service levels or simply large local variations. Previous attempts to explain service variations with aggregate, municipal level data have failed. We link representative Swedish data from 3,267 individuals aged 65 and older in 2002-2003 with coverage rates of public Home Help services in the 288 municipalities in which they reside. What past attempts have masked is that needs also vary substantially between municipalities; needs being defined as old people who live alone need help with their activities of daily living (ADL). Once these local individual level variations are incorporated, municipal differences in public Home Help coverage largely vanish. Multivariate analyses confirm that advanced age, inability to perform ADL and solitary living are the major determinants of Home Help use. Variations in local supply have no association with individual use of public Home Help. These services are unequal but hence yet deemed to be reasonably equitable.
本研究旨在调查服务缩减是否导致了服务水平的不公平,或者仅仅是导致了较大的地区差异。以往试图用市政层面的总体数据来解释服务差异的尝试均告失败。我们将2002年至2003年期间来自3267名65岁及以上瑞典人的代表性数据,与他们所居住的288个市政当局的公共居家护理服务覆盖率联系起来。过去的尝试所掩盖的是,各市政当局之间的需求也存在很大差异;需求被定义为独居且日常生活活动(ADL)需要帮助的老年人。一旦纳入这些地区个体层面的差异,公共居家护理覆盖率的市政差异就基本消失了。多变量分析证实,高龄、无法进行日常生活活动以及独居是使用居家护理服务的主要决定因素。当地供应的差异与个人使用公共居家护理服务无关。这些服务是不平等的,但仍被认为具有合理的公平性。