发表偏倚和刻板印象威胁研究：对齐格勒尔的回复。

Publication bias and stereotype threat research: A reply to Zigerell.

机构信息

Psychology Department, Michigan State University.

Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1169-1177. doi: 10.1037/apl0000242.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000242

PMID:28795833

Abstract

Zigerell (2017) demonstrated that 4 methods of examining publication bias applied to the meta-analysis presented by Nguyen and Ryan (2008) on stereotype threat effects yield highly divergent conclusions. The methods differ in the estimated magnitudes of publication bias and of the stereotype threat effect. Zigerell (2017), Nguyen and Ryan (2008), and the current article all strongly urge researchers to pay attention to moderators of stereotype threat effects, and we provide commentary on the state of this research focus. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

齐格勒尔（2017 年）证明，有 4 种检验发表偏倚的方法应用于 Nguyen 和 Ryan（2008 年）关于刻板印象威胁效应的荟萃分析，得出了截然不同的结论。这些方法在发表偏倚和刻板印象威胁效应的估计幅度上存在差异。齐格勒尔（2017 年）、Nguyen 和 Ryan（2008 年）以及本文都强烈敦促研究人员关注刻板印象威胁效应的调节因素，我们对这一研究重点的现状进行了评论。