Bahle Brett, Matsukura Michi, Hollingworth Andrew
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):367-386. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000468. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Visual search through real-world scenes is guided both by a representation of target features and by knowledge of the sematic properties of the scene (derived from scene gist recognition). In 3 experiments, we compared the relative roles of these 2 sources of guidance. Participants searched for a target object in the presence of a critical distractor object. The color of the critical distractor either matched or mismatched (a) the color of an item maintained in visual working memory for a secondary task (Experiment 1), or (b) the color of the target, cued by a picture before search commenced (Experiments 2 and 3). Capture of gaze by a matching distractor served as an index of template guidance. There were 4 main findings: (a) The distractor match effect was observed from the first saccade on the scene, (b) it was independent of the availability of scene-level gist-based guidance, (c) it was independent of whether the distractor appeared in a plausible location for the target, and (d) it was preserved even when gist-based guidance was available before scene onset. Moreover, gist-based, semantic guidance of gaze to target-plausible regions of the scene was delayed relative to template-based guidance. These results suggest that feature-based template guidance is not limited to plausible scene regions after an initial, scene-level analysis. (PsycINFO Database Record
通过现实场景进行视觉搜索既受目标特征表征的引导,也受场景语义属性知识(源自场景主旨识别)的引导。在3个实验中,我们比较了这两种引导源的相对作用。参与者在存在关键干扰物的情况下搜索目标物体。关键干扰物的颜色与(a)为次要任务保存在视觉工作记忆中的项目颜色匹配或不匹配(实验1),或者(b)在搜索开始前由图片提示的目标颜色匹配或不匹配(实验2和3)。匹配干扰物对注视的吸引作为模板引导的指标。有4个主要发现:(a)从对场景的第一次扫视开始就观察到干扰物匹配效应,(b)它与基于场景主旨的引导的可用性无关,(c)它与干扰物是否出现在目标的合理位置无关,(d)即使在场景开始前基于主旨的引导可用时,它也会保留。此外,相对于基于模板的引导,基于主旨的对场景中目标合理区域的语义引导延迟。这些结果表明,基于特征的模板引导在初始场景水平分析之后不限于合理的场景区域。(PsycINFO数据库记录