Suppr超能文献

公民与互联网:用认知工具应对数字挑战。

Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools.

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development.

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol.

出版信息

Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2020 Dec;21(3):103-156. doi: 10.1177/1529100620946707.

Abstract

The Internet has evolved into a ubiquitous and indispensable digital environment in which people communicate, seek information, and make decisions. Despite offering various benefits, online environments are also replete with smart, highly adaptive choice architectures designed primarily to maximize commercial interests, capture and sustain users' attention, monetize user data, and predict and influence future behavior. This online landscape holds multiple negative consequences for society, such as a decline in human autonomy, rising incivility in online conversation, the facilitation of political extremism, and the spread of disinformation. Benevolent choice architects working with regulators may curb the worst excesses of manipulative choice architectures, yet the strategic advantages, resources, and data remain with commercial players. One way to address some of this imbalance is with interventions that empower Internet users to gain some control over their digital environments, in part by boosting their information literacy and their cognitive resistance to manipulation. Our goal is to present a conceptual map of interventions that are based on insights from psychological science. We begin by systematically outlining how online and offline environments differ despite being increasingly inextricable. We then identify four major types of challenges that users encounter in online environments: persuasive and manipulative choice architectures, AI-assisted information architectures, false and misleading information, and distracting environments. Next, we turn to how psychological science can inform interventions to counteract these challenges of the digital world. After distinguishing among three types of behavioral and cognitive interventions-nudges, technocognition, and boosts-we focus on boosts, of which we identify two main groups: (a) those aimed at enhancing people's agency in their digital environments (e.g., self-nudging, deliberate ignorance) and (b) those aimed at boosting competencies of reasoning and resilience to manipulation (e.g., simple decision aids, inoculation). These cognitive tools are designed to foster the civility of online discourse and protect reason and human autonomy against manipulative choice architectures, attention-grabbing techniques, and the spread of false information.

摘要

互联网已经发展成为一个无处不在且不可或缺的数字环境,人们在其中进行交流、获取信息和做出决策。尽管提供了各种好处,但在线环境中也充斥着旨在最大化商业利益、捕捉和维持用户注意力、利用用户数据、预测和影响未来行为的智能、高度适应的选择架构。这种在线景观对社会有许多负面影响,例如人类自主性下降、在线对话中的不文明行为增加、政治极端主义的加剧以及虚假信息的传播。与监管机构合作的善意选择架构师可能会遏制操纵性选择架构的最坏弊端,但战略优势、资源和数据仍然掌握在商业参与者手中。解决这种不平衡的一种方法是采取干预措施,使互联网用户能够在一定程度上控制自己的数字环境,部分方法是提高他们的信息素养和对操纵的认知抵制能力。我们的目标是提出一个基于心理学科学见解的干预措施概念图。我们首先系统地概述了尽管在线和离线环境越来越不可分割,但它们仍有何不同。然后,我们确定了用户在在线环境中遇到的四个主要挑战:有说服力和操纵性的选择架构、人工智能辅助信息架构、虚假和误导性信息以及分散注意力的环境。接下来,我们转向心理学科学如何为对抗数字世界的这些挑战提供信息。在区分三种行为和认知干预措施(即推动、认知技术和助推器)之后,我们专注于助推器,其中我们确定了两个主要类别:(a)旨在增强人们在数字环境中的代理权的助推器(例如,自我推动、故意忽视)和(b)旨在增强推理能力和对操纵的抵御能力的助推器(例如,简单决策辅助工具、接种)。这些认知工具旨在促进在线话语的文明,并保护理性和人类自主性免受操纵性选择架构、吸引注意力的技术和虚假信息的传播的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2593/7745618/0bc529fcd53f/10.1177_1529100620946707-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验