• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Scanning electron microscope study of a new irrigation method in endodontic treatment.

作者信息

Goldman L B, Goldman M, Kronman J H, Lin P S

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979 Jul;48(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(79)90241-x.

DOI:10.1016/0030-4220(79)90241-x
PMID:287990
Abstract

The effectiveness of a newly developed perforated endodontic irrigation needle, with its distal aperture sealed, was compared to conventional endodontic irrigation procedures. In all instances 5 percent sodium hypochlorite was used since the delivery system, rather than the irrigant, was being evaluated. A base line group in which all soft tissue was described was also included. The results indicate that the perforated endodontic irrigation needle is a very effective instrument for the cleansing of instrumented root canals.

摘要

相似文献

1
Scanning electron microscope study of a new irrigation method in endodontic treatment.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979 Jul;48(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(79)90241-x.
2
Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.EndoVac系统与传统针管冲洗法在去除乳磨牙根管内玷污层方面的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;20(9):1168-1174. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.181351.
3
The efficacy of several endodontic irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopic study: Part 2.几种根管冲洗液的疗效:扫描电子显微镜研究:第2部分。
J Endod. 1982 Nov;8(11):487-92. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(82)80073-3.
4
Scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of endodontic irrigating systems.
Int Endod J. 1987 Nov;20(6):287-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00629.x.
5
Evaluation of Root Canal Dentin Erosion after Different Irrigation Methods Using Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy.使用能量色散X射线光谱法评估不同冲洗方法后的根管牙本质侵蚀情况。
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1834-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
Investigation of the Efficacy of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Versus Irrigation with Reciprocating Activation: An Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.被动超声冲洗与往复式激活冲洗效果的研究:一项环境扫描电子显微镜研究
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):659-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
7
Antibacterial Efficacy of a New Sonic Irrigation Device for Root Canal Disinfection.一种新型根管消毒超声冲洗装置的抗菌效果
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1799-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.024. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
8
Efficacy of 3 different irrigation systems on removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.3种不同冲洗系统对根管内氢氧化钙清除效果的扫描电镜研究
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation.使用EndoVac冲洗系统与传统根管针冲洗法时封闭剂渗透情况的比较。
J Endod. 2014 May;40(5):613-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
10
Forces and efficacy in endodontic irrigation systems.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Apr;53(4):425-8. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90446-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.主动与被动根管冲洗系统的清创效果与根尖挤出率比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.
2
An In Vitro SEM Study on the Effectiveness of Smear Layer Removal of Four Different Irrigations.四种不同冲洗液去除玷污层效果的体外扫描电镜研究
Iran Endod J. 2012 Fall;7(4):171-6. Epub 2012 Oct 13.