Centre for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;75(1):106-116. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12371. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
To develop and assess the validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to measure total flavonoid intake, and individual flavonoid subclasses, in older adults.
Retrospective analysis of flavonoid intake in older adults informed the development of a FFQ to measure flavonoid intake and determine the flavonoid subclasses consumed (anthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, flavones, flavonols and flavanones). Older adults (n = 42, mean age 75.3 ± 8.6 years) attended two interviews 1 month apart where anthropometrics (height and weight), blood pressure (BP), demographic data and a 93-item self-administered FFQ were collected. A 4-day food record (FR) was randomly administered between the two interview dates, and each food item was assigned a flavonoid and flavonoid subclass content using the United States Department of Agriculture flavonoid database. The criterion validity and reproducibility of the FFQ was assessed against a 4-day FR using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test, Spearman's correlation coefficient (r), Bland-Altman Plots and Cohen's kappa.
Total flavonoid intake was determined (median intake FFQ = 919.3 mg/day, FR = 781.4 mg/day). Tests of validity indicated that the FFQ consistently overestimated total flavonoid intake compared with the 4-day FR. There was a significant difference in estimates between the FFQ and the 4-day FR for total flavonoid intake (Wilcoxon signed-rank sum P < 0.001; Bland-Altman plots indicated large bias and wide limits of agreement), but they were well correlated (Spearman's r 0.93, P < 0.001; Cohen's kappa κ = 0.619, P < 0.001). For individual flavonoid subclasses, the tests of validity indicated greater discrepancy compared with 4-day FR. The FFQ showed high reproducibility for estimating total flavonoid intake (FFQ1vsFFQ2: Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test, P > 0.05; Spearman's r 0.91, P < 0.001; Bland-Altman plots visually showed small, non-significant bias and wide limits of agreement; and Cohen's kappa κ = 0.619, P < 0.001), with a small mean percentage difference (6.7%). For individual flavonoid subclasses, the tests of reproducibility between FFQ1 and FFQ2 showed similarly high reproducibility.
The developed FFQ appears suitable for satisfactorily ranking individuals according to total flavonoid intake. The FFQ shows limitations for estimating absolute total flavonoid intake and intake of flavonoid subclasses in comparison to a 4-day FR in terms of overestimating intake. Refinement and further validation of this tool may be required.
开发和评估一种用于测量老年人总类黄酮摄入量和个体类黄酮亚类摄入量的食物频率问卷(FFQ)的有效性和可重复性。
对老年人的类黄酮摄入量进行回顾性分析,为 FFQ 的开发提供了信息,以测量类黄酮摄入量并确定所消耗的类黄酮亚类(花青素、黄烷-3-醇、黄酮、黄酮醇和黄烷酮)。42 名老年人(平均年龄 75.3 ± 8.6 岁)参加了两次相隔一个月的访谈,在此期间收集了人体测量学(身高和体重)、血压(BP)、人口统计学数据和 93 项自我管理的 FFQ。在两次访谈之间随机进行了为期 4 天的食物记录(FR),并使用美国农业部的类黄酮数据库为每种食物分配了类黄酮和类黄酮亚类的含量。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验、Spearman 相关系数(r)、Bland-Altman 图和 Cohen's kappa 评估 FFQ 与 4 天 FR 的标准效度和可重复性。
确定了总类黄酮摄入量(FFQ 中位数摄入量=919.3mg/天,FR=781.4mg/天)。有效性测试表明,FFQ 始终高估了与 4 天 FR 相比的总类黄酮摄入量。FFQ 和 4 天 FR 之间的总类黄酮摄入量存在显著差异(Wilcoxon 符号秩和 P <0.001;Bland-Altman 图表明存在较大偏差和较宽的一致性界限),但相关性良好(Spearman's r 0.93,P <0.001;Cohen's kappa κ=0.619,P <0.001)。对于个体类黄酮亚类,与 4 天 FR 的有效性测试相比,差异更大。FFQ 对估计总类黄酮摄入量具有较高的可重复性(FFQ1vsFFQ2:Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验,P>0.05;Spearman's r 0.91,P<0.001;Bland-Altman 图视觉上显示出较小的、非显著的偏差和较宽的一致性界限;和 Cohen's kappa κ=0.619,P<0.001),平均百分比差异较小(6.7%)。对于个体类黄酮亚类,FFQ1 和 FFQ2 之间的可重复性测试显示出相似的高可重复性。
开发的 FFQ 似乎适合根据总类黄酮摄入量令人满意地对个体进行分类。与 4 天 FR 相比,FFQ 在估计绝对总类黄酮摄入量和类黄酮亚类摄入量方面存在局限性,表现为摄入量高估。可能需要进一步改进和验证该工具。