Aunan Eirik, Østergaard Daniel, Meland Arn, Dalheim Ketil, Sandvik Leiv
a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.
b Department of Radiology , Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust , Lillehammer.
Acta Orthop. 2017 Dec;88(6):657-663. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1362733. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
Background and purpose - There are many techniques for placing the femoral component in correct rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but only a few have been tested against the supposed gold standard, rotation determined by postoperative computed tomography (CT). We evaluated the accuracy and variability of a new method, the clinical rotational axis (CRA) method, and assessed the association between the CRA and knee function. Patients and methods - The CRA is a line derived from clinical judgement of information from the surgical transepicondylar axis, the anteroposterior axis, and the posterior condylar line. The CRA was used to guide the rotational positioning of the femoral component in 80 knees (46 female). At 3 years follow-up, the rotation of the femoral component was compared with the CT-derived surgical transepicondylar axis (CTsTEA) by 3 observers. Functional outcome was assessed with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient satisfaction (VAS). Results - The mean (95% CI) rotational deviation of the femoral component from the CTsTEA was 0.2° (-0.15°-0.55°). The standard deviation (95% CI) was 1.58° (1.36°-1.85°) and the range was from 3.7° internal rotation to 3.7° external rotation. No statistically significant association was found between femoral component rotation and KOOS, OKS, or VAS. Interpretation - The CRA method was found to be accurate with a low grade of variability.
背景与目的——在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,有多种技术可将股骨组件置于正确的旋转对线,但仅有少数技术与假定的金标准(术后计算机断层扫描(CT)确定的旋转)进行了对比测试。我们评估了一种新方法——临床旋转轴(CRA)法的准确性和变异性,并评估了CRA与膝关节功能之间的关联。患者与方法——CRA是一条通过对手术髁间轴、前后轴和后髁线信息进行临床判断得出的线。CRA被用于指导80例膝关节(46例女性)的股骨组件旋转定位。在3年随访时,由3名观察者将股骨组件的旋转与CT得出的手术髁间轴(CTsTEA)进行比较。使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)及患者满意度(视觉模拟评分法(VAS))评估功能结果。结果——股骨组件相对于CTsTEA的平均(95%可信区间)旋转偏差为0.2°(-0.15°至0.55°)。标准差(95%可信区间)为1.58°(1.36°至1.85°),范围为内旋3.7°至外旋3.7°。未发现股骨组件旋转与KOOS、OKS或VAS之间存在统计学显著关联。解读——发现CRA法准确且变异性低。