1 University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2 Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Qual Health Res. 2017 Sep;27(11):1738-1747. doi: 10.1177/1049732317711133. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Being able to describe how research findings become evidence is crucial in providing a justification for all kinds of research findings. However, qualitative researchers in health care, including those who conduct phenomenological research, are usually fairly modest when it comes qualifying their research findings as such. We advocate a view of evidence for phenomenological research, an approach that is rooted in philosophy of science, including perspectives of ontology, epistemology, and methodology. We suggest that phenomenology can become an exemplar for how qualitative research can make convincing arguments and thus can be better appreciated. In this article, we present a philosophical foundation for phenomenological evidence by exploring the notions of objectivity, validity, and generalizability in terms of openness, meaning, and essence.
能够描述研究结果如何成为证据对于为各种研究结果提供依据至关重要。然而,医疗保健领域的定性研究人员,包括那些进行现象学研究的人员,在将其研究结果定性为证据时通常相当谦虚。我们提倡一种现象学证据的观点,这种方法植根于科学哲学,包括本体论、认识论和方法论的观点。我们认为,现象学可以成为定性研究如何提出令人信服的论点的典范,从而可以得到更好的理解。在本文中,我们通过探讨开放性、意义和本质方面的客观性、有效性和可推广性的概念,为现象学证据提供了一个哲学基础。