• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非小细胞肺癌中使用胸腔积液和原发性肿瘤组织样本鉴定表皮生长因子受体基因突变的比较

Comparison of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations Identified Using Pleural Effusion and Primary Tumor Tissue Samples in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Liu Nan, Sun Rui-Ze, Du Jiang, Dong Qian-Ze, Fan Chui-Feng, Li Qing-Chang, Wang En-Hua, Liu Yang

机构信息

Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical, Sciences of China Medical University, Shenyang, P.R. China.

出版信息

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2018 Apr;26(4):e44-e51. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000543.

DOI:10.1097/PAI.0000000000000543
PMID:28800007
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the use of pleural effusion samples for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing in lung cancer is increasing, the accuracy rate and effectiveness of identifying EGFR mutations using these samples, rather than primary tumor tissue samples, is not established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-two advanced, non-small cell lung cancer patients were enrolled into this study. All patients had primary tumor tissue and corresponding pleural effusion samples, and we employed the Amplification Refractory Mutation System to detect EGFR gene mutations in these samples.

RESULT

The number of EGFR mutations detected in primary tumor tissue and pleural effusion samples was 119 (61.98%) and 113 (58.85%), respectively. The EGFR-mutation rate was significantly higher in female than in male patients, and in adenocarcinoma than in nonadenocarcinoma patients (P=0.000). Single mutations in exons 19 and 21 were the predominant observed mutation type, and the overall concordance rate of EGFR-mutation status between the 192 matched pleural effusion and primary tumor tissue samples was 86.98%.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a high concordance rate between EGFR mutations identified using primary tumor tissue and corresponding pleural effusion samples by Amplification Refractory Mutation System. Thus, it is likely that pleural effusion sampling from advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients, especially those with adenocarcinoma, may be effective in EGFR-mutation screening.

摘要

背景

尽管肺癌中使用胸腔积液样本进行表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测的情况日益增多,但使用这些样本而非原发性肿瘤组织样本鉴定EGFR突变的准确率和有效性尚未明确。

材料与方法

192例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者纳入本研究。所有患者均有原发性肿瘤组织和相应的胸腔积液样本,我们采用扩增阻滞突变系统检测这些样本中的EGFR基因突变。

结果

原发性肿瘤组织和胸腔积液样本中检测到的EGFR突变数量分别为119例(61.98%)和113例(58.85%)。女性患者的EGFR突变率显著高于男性患者,腺癌患者的EGFR突变率显著高于非腺癌患者(P = 0.000)。外显子19和21的单突变是主要的观察到的突变类型,192对匹配的胸腔积液和原发性肿瘤组织样本之间EGFR突变状态的总体一致性率为86.98%。

结论

我们观察到通过扩增阻滞突变系统使用原发性肿瘤组织和相应的胸腔积液样本鉴定的EGFR突变之间具有较高的一致性率。因此,对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,尤其是腺癌患者进行胸腔积液采样可能对EGFR突变筛查有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations Identified Using Pleural Effusion and Primary Tumor Tissue Samples in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌中使用胸腔积液和原发性肿瘤组织样本鉴定表皮生长因子受体基因突变的比较
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2018 Apr;26(4):e44-e51. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000543.
2
Predicting outcomes of EGFR-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients using pleural effusions samples and peptide nucleic acid probe assay.利用胸腔积液样本和肽核酸探针检测法预测非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体靶向治疗的疗效
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Oct 26;55(12):1979-1986. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0809.
3
Prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the plasma/pleural effusion to efficacy of gefitinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.血浆/胸腔积液中表皮生长因子受体突变对晚期非小细胞肺癌吉非替尼治疗疗效的预测
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep;136(9):1341-7. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0785-z. Epub 2010 Feb 14.
4
Clinical value of the detection of gene mutations in pleural effusion cell blocks among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.检测非小细胞肺癌患者胸腔积液细胞块中基因突变的临床价值。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2021 Jan-Mar;64(1):107-110. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_360_20.
5
Direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.直接测序和扩增受阻突变系统检测非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体突变。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Nov;30(5):2311-5. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2709. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
[Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in lung adenocarcinoma using biopsied tissue, pleural effusion and blood samples].[使用活检组织、胸腔积液和血液样本对肺腺癌中表皮生长因子受体基因突变的比较]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 8;47(10):775-779. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.10.008.
7
[Results of EGFR Mutations Detected in Pleural Effusion and Its 
Clinical Significance in 132 Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: 
A Retrospective Study in A Single Center].[132例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者胸腔积液中表皮生长因子受体突变检测结果及其临床意义:单中心回顾性研究]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 20;23(12):1059-1065. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2020.104.23.
8
Comparison of EGFR mutation rates in lung adenocarcinoma tissue and pleural effusion samples.肺腺癌组织与胸腔积液样本中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变率的比较。
Genet Mol Res. 2016 Apr 4;15(2):gmr7001. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15027001.
9
Detection of EGFR mutation in supernatant, cell pellets of pleural effusion and tumor tissues from non-small cell lung cancer patients by high resolution melting analysis and sequencing.通过高分辨率熔解分析和测序检测非小细胞肺癌患者胸腔积液上清液、细胞沉淀及肿瘤组织中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Dec 1;7(12):8813-22. eCollection 2014.
10
CT Radiogenomic Characterization of EGFR, K-RAS, and ALK Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌中EGFR、K-RAS和ALK突变的CT放射基因组学特征
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):32-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3814-0. Epub 2015 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of liquid biopsy versus tumor histology for detecting EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.一项关于液体活检与肿瘤组织学检测非小细胞肺癌中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的荟萃分析。
Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;47:102022. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102022. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
Carcinoembryonic antigen in pleural effusion of patients with lung adenocarcinoma: a predictive marker for EGFR mutation.肺腺癌患者胸腔积液中的癌胚抗原:一种表皮生长因子受体突变的预测标志物
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Aug;8(4):1027-1034. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.06.10.
3
Clinicopathologic Features and Molecular Biomarkers as Predictors of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体基因突变的临床病理特征及分子标志物预测。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Dec 24;29(1):77-93. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29010007.
4
Advances in pleural infection and malignancy.胸膜感染和恶性肿瘤的进展。
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Jan 13;30(159). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0002-2020. Print 2021 Mar 31.
5
Bronchial brushing cytology is comparable to bronchial biopsy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation test in non-small cell lung cancer.对于非小细胞肺癌的表皮生长因子受体突变检测,支气管刷检细胞学与支气管活检相当。
Cytojournal. 2020 Jul 16;17:16. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_73_2019. eCollection 2020.
6
Circulating plasma lncRNAs as novel markers of EGFR mutation status and monitors of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.循环血浆长链非编码 RNA 作为 EGFR 突变状态的新型标志物和表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的监测指标。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jan;11(1):29-40. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13216. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
7
Malignant pleural effusion and cancer of unknown primary site: a review of literature.恶性胸腔积液与原发部位不明的癌症:文献综述
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug;7(15):353. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.33.
8
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Frequency in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Diagnostic Performance in Cytological Samples: A Molecular and Immunohistochemical Study.鳞状细胞癌中表皮生长因子受体突变频率及其在细胞学样本中的诊断性能:一项分子与免疫组织化学研究
World J Oncol. 2019 Jun;10(3):142-150. doi: 10.14740/wjon1204. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
9
Discordance of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非小细胞肺癌中原发性肺肿瘤和配对远处转移灶表皮生长因子受体突变的不一致性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218414. eCollection 2019.
10
Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: a 2018 update.胸腔疾病诊断中的生物标志物:2018 年更新。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618808660. doi: 10.1177/1753466618808660.