Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Avda Alcalde Rovira Roure 80, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618808660. doi: 10.1177/1753466618808660.
The use of biomarkers on pleural fluid (PF) specimens may assist the decision-making process and enhance clinical diagnostic pathways. Three paradigmatic examples are heart failure, tuberculosis and, particularly, malignancy. An elevated PF concentration of the amino-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (>1500 pg/ml) is a hallmark of acute decompensated heart failure. Adenosine deaminase, interferon-γ and interleukin-27 are three valuable biomarkers for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy, yet only the first has been firmly established in clinical practice. Diagnostic PF biomarkers for malignancy can be classified as soluble-protein based, immunocytochemical and nucleic-acid based. Soluble markers (e.g. carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3, mesothelin) are only indicative of cancer, but not confirmatory. Immunocytochemical studies on PF cell blocks allow: (a) to distinguish mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations (e.g. loss of BAP1 nuclear expression, complemented by the demonstration of p16 deletion using fluorescence in situ hybridization, indicate mesothelioma); (b) to separate mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma (e.g. calretinin, CK 5/6, WT-1 and D2-40 are markers of mesothelioma, whereas CEA, EPCAM, TTF-1, napsin A, and claudin 4 are markers of carcinoma); and (c) to reveal tumor origin in pleural metastases of an unknown primary site (e.g. TTF-1 and napsin A for lung adenocarcinoma, p40 for squamous lung cancer, GATA3 and mammaglobin for breast cancer, or synaptophysin and chromogranin A for neuroendocrine tumors). Finally, PF may provide an adequate sample for analysis of molecular markers to guide patients with non-small cell lung cancer to appropriate targeted therapies. Molecular testing must include, at least, mutations of epidermal growth-factor receptor and BRAF V600E, translocations of rat osteosarcoma and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and expression of programmed death ligand 1.
胸腔积液(PF)标本中生物标志物的使用可以辅助决策过程并增强临床诊断途径。三个典型的例子是心力衰竭、结核病,尤其是恶性肿瘤。脑利钠肽前体氨基末端片段(probrain natriuretic peptide,proBNP)在 PF 中的浓度升高(>1500pg/ml)是急性失代偿性心力衰竭的标志。腺苷脱氨酶、干扰素-γ和白细胞介素-27 是诊断结核性胸膜炎的三个有价值的生物标志物,但只有前一个在临床实践中得到了充分确立。恶性肿瘤的 PF 诊断生物标志物可分为可溶性蛋白标志物、免疫细胞化学标志物和核酸标志物。可溶性标志物(如癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖链抗原 15-3、间皮素)仅提示癌症,但不能确诊。PF 细胞块的免疫细胞化学研究可以:(a)区分间皮瘤和反应性间皮增生(例如 BAP1 核表达缺失,同时通过荧光原位杂交检测 p16 缺失来补充,提示间皮瘤);(b)区分间皮瘤和腺癌(例如 calretinin、CK 5/6、WT-1 和 D2-40 是间皮瘤的标志物,而 CEA、EPCAM、TTF-1、 napsin A 和 claudin 4 是癌的标志物);和(c)揭示胸膜转移中未知原发部位的肿瘤来源(例如肺腺癌的 TTF-1 和 napsin A、肺鳞癌的 p40、乳腺癌的 GATA3 和 mammaglobin、或神经内分泌肿瘤的 synaptophysin 和 chromogranin A)。最后,PF 可为分析分子标志物提供足够的样本,以指导非小细胞肺癌患者进行适当的靶向治疗。分子检测必须至少包括表皮生长因子受体和 BRAF V600E 的突变、大鼠骨肉瘤和间变性淋巴瘤激酶的易位以及程序性死亡配体 1 的表达。