Suppr超能文献

胸腔疾病诊断中的生物标志物:2018 年更新。

Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: a 2018 update.

机构信息

Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Avda Alcalde Rovira Roure 80, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618808660. doi: 10.1177/1753466618808660.

Abstract

The use of biomarkers on pleural fluid (PF) specimens may assist the decision-making process and enhance clinical diagnostic pathways. Three paradigmatic examples are heart failure, tuberculosis and, particularly, malignancy. An elevated PF concentration of the amino-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (>1500 pg/ml) is a hallmark of acute decompensated heart failure. Adenosine deaminase, interferon-γ and interleukin-27 are three valuable biomarkers for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy, yet only the first has been firmly established in clinical practice. Diagnostic PF biomarkers for malignancy can be classified as soluble-protein based, immunocytochemical and nucleic-acid based. Soluble markers (e.g. carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3, mesothelin) are only indicative of cancer, but not confirmatory. Immunocytochemical studies on PF cell blocks allow: (a) to distinguish mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations (e.g. loss of BAP1 nuclear expression, complemented by the demonstration of p16 deletion using fluorescence in situ hybridization, indicate mesothelioma); (b) to separate mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma (e.g. calretinin, CK 5/6, WT-1 and D2-40 are markers of mesothelioma, whereas CEA, EPCAM, TTF-1, napsin A, and claudin 4 are markers of carcinoma); and (c) to reveal tumor origin in pleural metastases of an unknown primary site (e.g. TTF-1 and napsin A for lung adenocarcinoma, p40 for squamous lung cancer, GATA3 and mammaglobin for breast cancer, or synaptophysin and chromogranin A for neuroendocrine tumors). Finally, PF may provide an adequate sample for analysis of molecular markers to guide patients with non-small cell lung cancer to appropriate targeted therapies. Molecular testing must include, at least, mutations of epidermal growth-factor receptor and BRAF V600E, translocations of rat osteosarcoma and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and expression of programmed death ligand 1.

摘要

胸腔积液(PF)标本中生物标志物的使用可以辅助决策过程并增强临床诊断途径。三个典型的例子是心力衰竭、结核病,尤其是恶性肿瘤。脑利钠肽前体氨基末端片段(probrain natriuretic peptide,proBNP)在 PF 中的浓度升高(>1500pg/ml)是急性失代偿性心力衰竭的标志。腺苷脱氨酶、干扰素-γ和白细胞介素-27 是诊断结核性胸膜炎的三个有价值的生物标志物,但只有前一个在临床实践中得到了充分确立。恶性肿瘤的 PF 诊断生物标志物可分为可溶性蛋白标志物、免疫细胞化学标志物和核酸标志物。可溶性标志物(如癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖链抗原 15-3、间皮素)仅提示癌症,但不能确诊。PF 细胞块的免疫细胞化学研究可以:(a)区分间皮瘤和反应性间皮增生(例如 BAP1 核表达缺失,同时通过荧光原位杂交检测 p16 缺失来补充,提示间皮瘤);(b)区分间皮瘤和腺癌(例如 calretinin、CK 5/6、WT-1 和 D2-40 是间皮瘤的标志物,而 CEA、EPCAM、TTF-1、 napsin A 和 claudin 4 是癌的标志物);和(c)揭示胸膜转移中未知原发部位的肿瘤来源(例如肺腺癌的 TTF-1 和 napsin A、肺鳞癌的 p40、乳腺癌的 GATA3 和 mammaglobin、或神经内分泌肿瘤的 synaptophysin 和 chromogranin A)。最后,PF 可为分析分子标志物提供足够的样本,以指导非小细胞肺癌患者进行适当的靶向治疗。分子检测必须至少包括表皮生长因子受体和 BRAF V600E 的突变、大鼠骨肉瘤和间变性淋巴瘤激酶的易位以及程序性死亡配体 1 的表达。

相似文献

1
Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: a 2018 update.
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618808660. doi: 10.1177/1753466618808660.
2
[Contribution of pleural fluid analysis to the diagnosis of pleural effusion].
Med Clin (Barc). 2015 Aug 21;145(4):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
3
Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker in differentiating parapneumonic effusion from tuberculous pleurisy or malignant effusion.
Clin Biochem. 2013 Oct;46(15):1484-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Diagnostic significance of interferon-gamma in tuberculous pleural effusions.
Chest. 2003 Mar;123(3):740-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3.740.
10
High pleural fluid hyaluronan concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis.
Eur Respir J. 1999 Mar;13(3):519-22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.13351999.

引用本文的文献

2
Soluble programmed cell death ligand-1 as a predictive biomarker for severity and poor prognosis in pulmonary tuberculosis.
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2527364. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2527364. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
5
Exosomal miR-182-5p is a potential diagnostic marker for malignant pleural effusion.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):1138-1148. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2024-1205. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
6
Application of the metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology to identify the causes of pleural effusion.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 19;12:1525100. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1525100. eCollection 2025.
10
Clinical overview of the physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid movement: a narrative review.
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Sep 30;10(5). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00050-2024. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Pleural Fluid Adenosine Deaminase for Diagnosing Tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of Spanish Studies.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;55(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Investigating unilateral pleural effusions: the role of cytology.
Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 8;52(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01254-2018. Print 2018 Nov.
3
Advances in Molecular Testing Techniques in Cytologic Specimens.
Surg Pathol Clin. 2018 Sep;11(3):669-677. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2018.04.007.
4
ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions.
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jul 27;52(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00349-2018. Print 2018 Jul.
5
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2018.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jul;16(7):807-821. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0062.
7
The diagnostic role of BAP1 in serous effusions.
Hum Pathol. 2018 Sep;79:122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Clinical Characteristics of 320 Patients.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;55(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Immunohistochemistry for Diagnosis of Metastatic Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site.
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Apr 5;10(4):108. doi: 10.3390/cancers10040108.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验