Ebrahimi-Monfared Mohsen, Sharafkhah Mojtaba, Abdolrazaghnejad Ali, Mohammadbeigi Abolfazl, Faraji Fardin
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak/Iran.
Students Research Committee, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak/Iran.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):385-393. doi: 10.3233/RNN-160704.
Melatonin is known to be effective in curing migraine.
This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of melatonin versus sodium valproate in the prophylaxis of chronic migraine.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included patients with chronic migraine who were divided into three equal sized groups, and baseline therapy with nortriptyline (10-25 mg) and propranolol (20-40 mg) was used. Patients in groups A, B, and C were adjunctively treated daily with 3 mg melatonin, 200 mg sodium valproate, and a placebo, respectively. The patients underwent treatment for 2 months and follow-up was done at baseline (baseline), first (I) and second month (II). Attack frequency (AF), attack duration, attack severity, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score (within 3 months in two steps), analgesic intake, and drug side effects between the groups and during follow-up were compared.
The mean of monthly AF (melatonin: baseline: 4.2, I: 3.1, II: 2.5, p = 0.018; valproate: baseline: 4.3, I: 3.1, II: 2.3, p = 0.001; placebo: baseline: 4.1, I: 3.8, II: 3.8 p = 0.211), attack duration (hr) (melatonin: baseline: 19.8, I: 10.1, II: 8.7, p < 0.001; valproate: baseline: 19.5, I: 10.2, II: 8.8, p < 0.001; placebo: baseline: 19.6, I: 15.4, II: 14.1, p = 0.271), attack severity (melatonin: baseline: 7.3, I: 5.4, II: 3.5, p < 0.001; valproate: baseline: 7.4, I: 5.3, II: 3.4, p = 0.000; placebo: baseline: 7.3, I: 6.4, II: 6, p = 0.321), and MIDAS score (melatonin: baseline: 15.2, II: 8.9, p = 0.005; valproate: baseline: 16.1, II: 8.3, p = 0.001; placebo: baseline: 16, II: 12.1, p = 0.44), were significantly reduced in the melatonin and sodium valproate groups, but not in the placebo groups. Adverse events were reported in 11 patients (10.47%): 2 (5.71%) during melatonin treatment, 8 (22.85%) during valproate, and 1 (2.85%) during placebo.
The adjuvant treatment with melatonin was found to be superior to the placebo and had the same clinical efficacy as sodium valproate, but with higher tolerability. Melatonin may prove to be an efficient substitute for sodium valproate, as a chronic migraine prophylaxis.
已知褪黑素对治疗偏头痛有效。
本研究旨在探讨褪黑素与丙戊酸钠在预防慢性偏头痛方面的治疗效果。
这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验纳入了慢性偏头痛患者,这些患者被分为三个等规模的组,并采用去甲替林(10 - 25毫克)和普萘洛尔(20 - 40毫克)进行基线治疗。A组、B组和C组患者分别每天辅助使用3毫克褪黑素、200毫克丙戊酸钠和一种安慰剂。患者接受治疗2个月,并在基线(基线)、第1个月(I)和第2个月(II)进行随访。比较各组之间以及随访期间的发作频率(AF)、发作持续时间、发作严重程度、偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)评分(分两步在3个月内)、镇痛药摄入量和药物副作用。
每月AF的平均值(褪黑素组:基线:4.2,I:3.1,II:2.5,p = 0.018;丙戊酸钠组:基线:4.3,I:3.1,II:2.3,p = 0.001;安慰剂组:基线:4.1,I:3.8,II:3.8,p = 0.211)、发作持续时间(小时)(褪黑素组:基线:19.8,I:10.1,II:8.7,p < 0.001;丙戊酸钠组:基线:19.5,I:10.2,II:8.8,p < 0.001;安慰剂组:基线:19.6,I:15.4,II:14.1,p = 0.271)、发作严重程度(褪黑素组:基线:7.3,I:5.4,II:3.5,p < 0.001;丙戊酸钠组:基线:7.4,I:5.3,II:3.4,p = 0.000;安慰剂组:基线:7.3,I:6.4,II:6,p = 0.321)和MIDAS评分(褪黑素组:基线:15.2,II:8.9,p = 0.005;丙戊酸钠组:基线:16.1,II:8.3,p = 0.001;安慰剂组:基线:16,II:12.1,p = 0.44)在褪黑素组和丙戊酸钠组中均显著降低,但在安慰剂组中未降低。11名患者(10.47%)报告了不良事件:褪黑素治疗期间2例(5.71%),丙戊酸钠治疗期间8例(22.85%),安慰剂治疗期间1例(2.85%)。
发现褪黑素辅助治疗优于安慰剂,并且与丙戊酸钠具有相同的临床疗效,但耐受性更高。作为慢性偏头痛的预防药物,褪黑素可能被证明是丙戊酸钠的有效替代品。