Suppr超能文献

盆腔底肌肉训练对尿失禁女性性功能的影响,以及电刺激与标准治疗的比较(IPSU 试验):一项随机对照试验。

Impact of pelvic floor muscle training on sexual function of women with urinary incontinence and a comparison of electrical stimulation versus standard treatment (IPSU trial): a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Urogynaecology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2SF, United Kingdom.

School of Health & Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2018 Mar;104(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of electric stimulation plus standard pelvic floor muscle training compared to standard pelvic floor muscle training alone in women with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction.

METHODS

Single centre two arm parallel group randomised controlled trial conducted in a Teaching hospital in England. Participants were women presenting with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. The interventions compared were electric stimulation versus standard pelvic floor muscle training.

OUTCOME MEASURES

included Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual function Questionnaire (PISQ) physical function dimension at post-treatment (primary); other dimensions of PISQ, SF-36; EQ-5D, EPAQ, resource use, adverse events and cost-effectiveness (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

114 women were randomised (Intervention n=57; Control group n=57). 64/114 (56%).

PARTICIPANTS

had valid primary outcome data at follow-up (Intervention 30; Control 34). The mean PISQ-PF dimension scores at follow-up were 33.1 (SD 5.5) and 32.3 (SD 5.2) for the Intervention and Control groups respectively; with the Control group having a higher (better) score. After adjusting for baseline score, BMI, menopausal status, time from randomisation and baseline oxford scale score the mean difference was -1.0 (95% CI: -4.0 to 1.9; P=0.474). There was no differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes at follow-up. Within this study, the use of electrical stimulation was cost-effective with very small incremental costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs).

CONCLUSIONS

In women presenting with urinary incontinence in conjunction with sexual dysfunction, physiotherapy is beneficial to improve overall sexual function. However no specific form of physiotherapy is beneficial over another. Trial registration ISRCTN09586238.

摘要

目的

评估电刺激联合标准盆底肌训练与单纯标准盆底肌训练治疗尿失禁合并性功能障碍女性的临床疗效和成本效益。

方法

在英格兰一所教学医院进行的单中心双臂平行组随机对照试验。参与者为患有尿失禁和性功能障碍的女性。比较的干预措施为电刺激与标准盆底肌训练。

结局指标

包括治疗后即刻的脱垂和尿失禁性功能问卷(PISQ)生理功能维度(主要结局);PISQ 的其他维度、SF-36、EQ-5D、EPAQ、资源利用、不良事件和成本效益(次要结局)。

结果

114 名女性被随机分配(干预组 57 名;对照组 57 名)。64/114(56%)名女性在随访时有有效的主要结局数据(干预组 30 名;对照组 34 名)。随访时,干预组和对照组的 PISQ-PF 维度评分分别为 33.1(SD 5.5)和 32.3(SD 5.2),对照组的评分更高(更好)。在调整基线评分、BMI、绝经状态、随机分组时间和基线牛津量表评分后,平均差异为-1.0(95%CI:-4.0 至 1.9;P=0.474)。在随访时,两组在任何次要结局上均无差异。在这项研究中,电刺激的使用具有成本效益,增量成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)非常小。

结论

在伴有性功能障碍的尿失禁女性中,物理治疗有益于改善整体性功能。然而,没有一种特定形式的物理治疗比另一种更有益。试验注册 ISRCTN09586238。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验