Suppr超能文献

“没有身体自主权,我们就没有自由”:探讨2016年美国总统大选后女性对未来避孕措施可及性的担忧。

"Without bodily autonomy we are not free": exploring women's concerns about future access to contraception following the 2016 US presidential election.

作者信息

Judge Colleen P, Wolgemuth Tierney E, Hamm Megan E, Borrero Sonya

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA; Center for Women's Health Research and Innovation, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA; Center for Women's Health Research and Innovation, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2017 Nov;96(5):370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.169. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Following the 2016US presidential election, social media posts and news stories amplified concerns about the potential for reduced access to contraception under the incoming administration and urged women to seek long-acting reversible contraception. We aimed to describe women's concerns about future access to contraception, in their own words.

STUDY DESIGN

A social-media-based, anonymous online survey assessing thoughts and concerns about future access to contraception was distributed to reproductive-aged US women for 1 week in mid-January 2017. Participants who were concerned about future access to contraception could share their thoughts and feelings in an open-ended comments box. We qualitatively analyzed 449 written responses for content and themes, with the goal of characterizing key concerns.

RESULTS

Women who provided written comments had a mean age of 28years; 85% were white, 88% had at least a college degree, and 93% identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning. Women were highly concerned about future affordability of contraceptive methods due to potential loss of insurance, reduced insurance coverage for contraceptive methods and reduced access to low-cost care at Planned Parenthood. Many also worried about increased restrictions on abortion. Participants' concerns regarding access to contraception and abortion centered around themes of reproductive and bodily autonomy, which women described as fundamental rights.

CONCLUSIONS

Women in this study expressed considerable fear and uncertainty regarding their future access to contraception and abortion following the 2016US presidential election. The potential for restricted access to affordable contraception and abortion was viewed as an unacceptable limitation on bodily autonomy.

IMPLICATIONS

As the future of US health care policy is debated, many women are concerned about the impact of policy changes on their ability to access affordable contraception and abortion, which many view as essential to the preservation of bodily and reproductive autonomy.

摘要

目的

2016年美国总统大选后,社交媒体帖子和新闻报道加剧了人们对新政府执政下避孕措施获取可能性降低的担忧,并敦促女性寻求长效可逆避孕方法。我们旨在用女性自己的话来描述她们对未来避孕措施获取情况的担忧。

研究设计

2017年1月中旬,一项基于社交媒体的匿名在线调查被分发给美国育龄女性,为期1周,该调查评估了对未来避孕措施获取情况的想法和担忧。担心未来避孕措施获取情况的参与者可以在一个开放式评论框中分享他们的想法和感受。我们对449条书面回复的内容和主题进行了定性分析,目的是确定主要担忧。

结果

提供书面评论的女性平均年龄为28岁;85%为白人,88%至少拥有大学学位,93%认定为民主党人或倾向于民主党。由于可能失去保险、避孕方法的保险覆盖范围减少以及在计划生育组织获得低成本护理的机会减少,女性高度担心未来避孕方法的可负担性。许多人还担心堕胎限制增加。参与者对避孕措施和堕胎获取情况的担忧集中在生殖和身体自主权主题上,女性将其描述为基本权利。

结论

本研究中的女性对2016年美国总统大选后未来避孕措施和堕胎获取情况表达了相当大的恐惧和不确定性。可负担的避孕措施和堕胎获取受限的可能性被视为对身体自主权不可接受的限制。

启示

随着美国医疗保健政策的未来受到辩论,许多女性担心政策变化对她们获取可负担避孕措施和堕胎能力的影响,许多人认为这对维护身体和生殖自主权至关重要。

相似文献

2
Choice, access, information are among clients' rights.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1993 Aug;14(1):24-6.
3
Current reproductive technologies: increased access and choice?
J Soc Issues. 2005 Mar;61(1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00391.x.
4
How does religious affiliation affect women's attitudes toward reproductive health policy? Implications for the Affordable Care Act.
Contraception. 2015 Jun;91(6):513-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
5
The politics of women's health: setting a global agenda.
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(1):47-65. doi: 10.2190/U7PN-B17E-JQBL-MRG4.
6
The impact of US policy on contraceptive access: a policy analysis.
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01289-3.
7
Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):716.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
8
Abortion, reproductive rights and maternal mortality.
Focus Gend. 1994 Jun;2(2):45-50. doi: 10.1080/09682869308520025.
9
Women's Pathways to Abortion Care in South Carolina: A Qualitative Study of Obstacles and Supports.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):199-207. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12006. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Conscientious objection to provision of legal abortion care.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123 Suppl 3:S60-2. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60004-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Contraceptive decision making after the 2016 US presidential election.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):89-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
2
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Affordable Care Act's Mandate Eliminating Contraceptive Cost Sharing Influenced Choices Of Women With Employer Coverage.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1608-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1457.
4
Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007-2012.
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Nov;59(5):577-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.024. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
5
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
7
Health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age before and after implementation of the affordable care act.
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Changes in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women, 2009-2012.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):917-927. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094.
9
Changes in out-of-pocket costs for hormonal IUDs after implementation of the Affordable Care Act: an analysis of insurance benefit inquiries.
Contraception. 2016 Feb;93(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验