Suppr超能文献

促进医疗保健专业人员研究使用的角色和特征:范围综述。

Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review.

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e014384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014384.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementing research findings into practice is a complex process that is not well understood. Facilitation has been described as a key component of getting research findings into practice. The literature on facilitation as a practice innovation is growing. This review aimed to identify facilitator roles and to describe characteristics of facilitation that may be associated with successful research use by healthcare professionals.

METHODS

We searched 10 electronic databases up to December 2016 and used predefined criteria to select articles. We included conceptual papers and empirical studies that described facilitator roles, facilitation processes or interventions, and that focused on healthcare professionals and research use. We used content and thematic analysis to summarise data. Rogers' five main attributes of an innovation guided our synthesis of facilitation characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 38 488 articles identified from our online and manual search, we included 195 predominantly research studies. We identified nine facilitator roles: opinion leaders, coaches, champions, research facilitators, clinical/practice facilitators, outreach facilitators, linking agents, knowledge brokers and external-internal facilitators. Fifteen facilitation characteristics were associated with research use, which we grouped into five categories using Rogers' innovation attributes: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a diverse and broad literature on the concept of facilitation that can expand our current thinking about facilitation as an innovation and its potential to support an integrated, collaborative approach to improving healthcare delivery.

摘要

背景

将研究成果付诸实践是一个复杂的过程,目前人们对此了解甚少。促进被描述为将研究成果付诸实践的关键组成部分。关于促进作为一种实践创新的文献正在不断增加。本次综述旨在确定促进者的角色,并描述可能与医疗保健专业人员成功使用研究相关的促进特征。

方法

我们检索了截至 2016 年 12 月的 10 个电子数据库,并使用预定义的标准来选择文章。我们纳入了描述促进者角色、促进过程或干预措施的概念性论文和实证研究,这些研究的重点是医疗保健专业人员和研究的使用。我们使用内容和主题分析来总结数据。罗杰斯的创新的五个主要属性指导了我们对促进特征的综合。

结果

从我们的在线和手动搜索中,共确定了 38488 篇文章,我们纳入了 195 篇主要的研究论文。我们确定了 9 种促进者的角色:意见领袖、教练、拥护者、研究促进者、临床/实践促进者、外展促进者、联络代理、知识经纪人、内部/外部促进者。有 15 个促进特征与研究的使用相关,我们使用罗杰斯创新属性将其分为五类:相对优势、兼容性、复杂性、试验性和可观察性。

结论

我们发现了一个关于促进概念的多样化和广泛的文献,可以扩展我们对促进作为一种创新及其支持改善医疗保健服务的综合、协作方法的潜力的现有思维。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a17d/5724142/bbc80ce3399b/bmjopen-2016-014384f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验