Georgetown University.
Health Affairs.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Dec;42(6):1113-1125. doi: 10.1215/03616878-4193654. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
States' role in payment as well as coverage will be subject to debate as the administration and the Congress decide how to address the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and otherwise reshape the nation's health policies. Acting as stewards of health care for the entire state population and stimulated by concern about rising costs and federal support under the ACA, the elected and administrative leaders of some states have been using their political influence and authority to improve their state's overall systems of care regardless of who pays the bill. In early 2015 we conducted on-site interviews with key stakeholders in five states to explore their strategies for payment and delivery reform. We found that despite these states' similar goals, differences in their statutory authority and purchasing power, along with their leaders' willingness to use them, significantly influence a state's ability to achieve reform objectives. We caution federal and state policy makers to recognize the reality that state leaders' political desire to exercise stewardship may not be enough to achieve it.
在行政部门和国会决定如何解决《平价医疗法案》(ACA)以及如何重塑国家卫生政策时,州政府在支付和覆盖范围方面的作用将成为争论的焦点。一些州的民选和行政领导人作为整个州人口的医疗保健管理者,出于对成本上升和 ACA 下联邦支持的担忧,利用其政治影响力和权威,无论谁来支付账单,都在努力改善其州的整体医疗体系。2015 年初,我们对五个州的主要利益相关者进行了现场访谈,以探讨他们在支付和交付改革方面的策略。我们发现,尽管这些州的目标相似,但在法定权力和购买力方面存在差异,以及领导人是否愿意使用这些权力,这极大地影响了一个州实现改革目标的能力。我们告诫联邦和州政策制定者认识到这样一个现实,即州领导人履行管家职责的政治愿望可能不足以实现这一目标。