• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实世界中的 2 型糖尿病:血糖控制的艰巨性。

Type 2 Diabetes in the Real World: The Elusive Nature of Glycemic Control.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1425-1432. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1974. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

DOI:10.2337/dc16-1974
PMID:28801473
Abstract

Despite U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of over 40 new treatment options for type 2 diabetes since 2005, the latest data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey show that the proportion of patients achieving glycated hemoglobin (HbA) <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) remains around 50%, with a negligible decline between the periods 2003-2006 and 2011-2014. The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set reports even more alarming rates, with only about 40% and 30% of patients achieving HbA <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) in the commercially insured (HMO) and Medicaid populations, respectively, again with virtually no change over the past decade. A recent retrospective cohort study using a large U.S. claims database explored why clinical outcomes are not keeping pace with the availability of new treatment options. The study found that HbA reductions fell far short of those reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with poor medication adherence emerging as the key driver behind the disconnect. In this Perspective, we examine the implications of these findings in conjunction with other data to highlight the discrepancy between RCT findings and the real world, all pointing toward the underrealized promise of FDA-approved therapies and the critical importance of medication adherence. While poor medication adherence is not a new issue, it has yet to be effectively addressed in clinical practice-often, we suspect, because it goes unrecognized. To support the busy health care professional, innovative approaches are sorely needed.

摘要

尽管自 2005 年以来,美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 已批准了 40 多种治疗 2 型糖尿病的新方案,但从全国健康和营养检查调查的最新数据来看,达到糖化血红蛋白 (HbA) <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) 的患者比例仍约为 50%,在 2003-2006 年和 2011-2014 年期间几乎没有下降。医疗保健效果数据和信息集的报告甚至显示出更令人震惊的比率,只有约 40%和 30%的商业保险 (HMO) 和医疗补助人群中的患者分别达到 HbA <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol),而且在过去十年中几乎没有变化。最近一项使用美国大型索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究探讨了为什么临床结果没有跟上新治疗方案的步伐。该研究发现,HbA 降低的幅度远低于随机临床试验 (RCT) 报告的幅度,药物依从性差是导致脱节的关键驱动因素。在本观点中,我们结合其他数据研究这些发现的含义,以突出 RCT 结果与现实世界之间的差异,所有这些都指向 FDA 批准的治疗方法的未充分实现的承诺和药物依从性的至关重要性。虽然药物依从性差并不是一个新问题,但它在临床实践中尚未得到有效解决——通常,我们怀疑,是因为它没有被认识到。为了支持忙碌的医疗保健专业人员,迫切需要创新方法。

相似文献

1
Type 2 Diabetes in the Real World: The Elusive Nature of Glycemic Control.真实世界中的 2 型糖尿病:血糖控制的艰巨性。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1425-1432. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1974. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
2
Understanding the Gap Between Efficacy in Randomized Controlled Trials and Effectiveness in Real-World Use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 Therapies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.理解 GLP-1RA 和 DPP-4 治疗药物在 2 型糖尿病患者中的随机对照试验疗效与真实世界应用效果之间的差距。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1469-1478. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2725. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
3
Real-world Canagliflozin Utilization: Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus-A Multi-Database Synthesis.卡格列净在现实世界中的应用:2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制——多数据库综合分析
Clin Ther. 2016 Sep;38(9):2071-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.168. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
4
Adherence to Oral Glucose-Lowering Therapies and Associations With 1-Year HbA1c: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis in a Large Primary Care Database.口服降糖治疗的依从性及其与1年糖化血红蛋白的关联:一项基于大型初级保健数据库的回顾性队列分析
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):258-263. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1194. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Retrospective Study on the Impact of Adherence in Achieving Glycemic Goals in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Receiving Canagliflozin.接受卡格列净治疗的2型糖尿病患者依从性对实现血糖目标影响的回顾性研究
Adv Ther. 2017 Apr;34(4):937-953. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0500-4. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Glycemic Control Outcomes After Canagliflozin Initiation: Observations in a Medicare and Commercial Managed Care Population in Clinical Practice.卡格列净起始治疗后的血糖控制结果:临床实践中医疗保险和商业管理式医疗人群的观察结果
Clin Ther. 2016 Sep;38(9):2046-2057.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
A Comparison of Data Driven-based Measures of Adherence to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Medicaid Patients.医疗补助患者中基于数据驱动的口服降糖药依从性测量方法的比较
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1294-301. eCollection 2014.
8
Are patients on basal insulin attaining glycemic targets? Characteristics and goal achievement of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with basal insulin and physician-perceived barriers to achieving glycemic targets.基础胰岛素治疗的患者血糖达标情况如何?接受基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的特征及血糖达标情况和医生认为的血糖达标障碍。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;121:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
9
Adherence, persistence, glycaemic control and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with liraglutide or exenatide once weekly at 12-month follow-up in a real-world setting in the United States.在美国真实世界环境中,在 12 个月随访时,与利拉鲁肽或每周一次艾塞那肽相比,接受度、持续性、血糖控制和 2 型糖尿病患者的成本在起始接受度格鲁肽的患者中。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):920-929. doi: 10.1111/dom.13603. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
10
Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者对血糖控制丧失的反应迟缓。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Mar;9(3):213-7.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the 'real-world' experience with fixed-ratio combination therapy (insulin + GLP-1 receptor agonist) in routine clinical practice? Take-home messages for clinicians regarding key outcomes.在常规临床实践中,固定比例联合治疗(胰岛素+GLP-1受体激动剂)的“真实世界”经验是什么?给临床医生关于关键结果的实用信息。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27 Suppl 7:26-41. doi: 10.1111/dom.16593. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
2
Enhancing Type 2 Diabetes Care With CGM Integration: Insights From an Italian Expert Group.通过集成持续葡萄糖监测改善2型糖尿病护理:来自一个意大利专家小组的见解
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2025 Jul;41(5):e70059. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.70059.
3
Once-weekly Basal Insulin Fc versus daily insulin degludec for glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
每周一次基础胰岛素Fc与每日一次德谷胰岛素在糖尿病血糖控制中的比较:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Mar 20;24(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01602-y. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
The Utility of Smart Multiple Daily Injection Systems in Intensive Insulin-Treated People With Diabetes: An Italian Expert Consensus.智能多次皮下注射系统在强化胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中的应用:一项意大利专家共识。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 10:19322968251316577. doi: 10.1177/19322968251316577.
5
Diabetes knowledge and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients at public hospitals in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚德布雷伯哈恩公立医院2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病知识与血糖控制
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0317288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317288. eCollection 2025.
6
Association of the glycemic background patterns and the diabetes management efficacy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.血糖背景模式与血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者糖尿病管理疗效的关联
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jan 15;16(1):98322. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i1.98322.
7
AUGMENTed Real-World Data Enhances Comparative Efficacy Between Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec with Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U300 in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes.增强型真实世界数据提升了在初治2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次注射icodec胰岛素并搭配给药指南应用程序与每日一次注射甘精胰岛素U300之间的疗效对比。
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Feb;16(2):227-239. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01679-3. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
8
Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.人工智能用于诊断糖尿病并发症。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):246-264. doi: 10.1177/19322968241287773. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
9
The intelligent diabetes telemonitoring using decision support to treat patients on insulin therapy (DiaTRUST) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于决策支持的智能糖尿病远程监测用于胰岛素治疗患者的试验(DiaTRUST):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 8;25(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08588-7.
10
Treatment of type 2 diabetes and stress using neuro-emotional technique: case report.采用神经情绪技术治疗 2 型糖尿病和应激:病例报告。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 10;15:1382757. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1382757. eCollection 2024.