Lees P, Pelligand L, Whiting M, Chambers D, Toutain P-L, Whitehead M L
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Campus, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Hall Manor, Kelly, Lifton, Devon PL16 0HQ, UK.
Vet Rec. 2017 Aug 12;181(7):170-176. doi: 10.1136/vr.104278.
For many years after its invention around 1796, homeopathy was widely used in people and later in animals. Over the intervening period (1796-2016) pharmacology emerged as a science from Materia Medica (medicinal materials) to become the mainstay of veterinary therapeutics. There remains today a much smaller, but significant, use of homeopathy by veterinary surgeons. Homeopathic products are sometimes administered when conventional drug therapies have not succeeded, but are also used as alternatives to scientifically based therapies and licensed products. The principles underlying the veterinary use of drug-based and homeopathic products are polar opposites; this provides the basis for comparison between them. This two-part review compares and contrasts the two treatment forms in respect of history, constituents, methods of preparation, known or postulated mechanisms underlying responses, the legal basis for use and scientific credibility in the 21st century. Part 1 begins with a consideration of why therapeutic products actually work or appear to do so.
1796年左右发明后,顺势疗法在人类中广泛应用多年,后来也应用于动物。在这一期间(1796年至2016年),药理学从药物学(药用材料)发展成为一门科学,成为兽医治疗学的支柱。如今,兽医对顺势疗法的使用规模小得多,但仍很重要。顺势疗法产品有时在传统药物治疗未成功时使用,但也被用作科学疗法和许可产品的替代品。基于药物的产品和顺势疗法产品在兽医使用中的基本原理截然相反;这为它们之间的比较提供了基础。这篇分两部分的综述从历史、成分、制备方法、已知或推测的反应机制、使用的法律依据以及21世纪的科学可信度等方面对这两种治疗形式进行了比较和对比。第1部分首先思考治疗产品实际起作用或看似起作用的原因。