Matute Helena, Blanco Fernando, Yarritu Ion, Díaz-Lago Marcos, Vadillo Miguel A, Barberia Itxaso
Departamento de Fundamentos y Métodos de la Psicología, Universidad de Deusto , Bilbao, Spain.
Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London , London, UK.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. eCollection 2015.
Illusions of causality occur when people develop the belief that there is a causal connection between two events that are actually unrelated. Such illusions have been proposed to underlie pseudoscience and superstitious thinking, sometimes leading to disastrous consequences in relation to critical life areas, such as health, finances, and wellbeing. Like optical illusions, they can occur for anyone under well-known conditions. Scientific thinking is the best possible safeguard against them, but it does not come intuitively and needs to be taught. Teaching how to think scientifically should benefit from better understanding of the illusion of causality. In this article, we review experiments that our group has conducted on the illusion of causality during the last 20 years. We discuss how research on the illusion of causality can contribute to the teaching of scientific thinking and how scientific thinking can reduce illusion.
当人们认为两个实际上并无关联的事件之间存在因果联系时,就会产生因果错觉。有人提出,这种错觉是伪科学和迷信思维的基础,有时会在诸如健康、财务和幸福等关键生活领域导致灾难性后果。与视觉错觉一样,在众所周知的条件下,任何人都可能出现因果错觉。科学思维是防范它们的最佳保障,但它并非与生俱来,需要传授。了解因果错觉将有助于科学思维的教学。在本文中,我们回顾了我们团队在过去20年里针对因果错觉所开展的实验。我们讨论了因果错觉研究如何能促进科学思维的教学,以及科学思维如何减少错觉。