• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化知觉动作技能评估:一种适用于小学低年级儿童的新的视觉知觉动作技能评估工具。

The Computerized Perceptual Motor Skills Assessment: A new visual perceptual motor skills evaluation tool for children in early elementary grades.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States.

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Oct;69:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.07.010
PMID:28802160
Abstract

Visual perceptual motor skills have been proposed as underlying courses of handwriting difficulties. However, there is no evaluation tool currently available to assess these skills comprehensively and to serve as a sensitive measure. The purpose of this study was to validate the Computerized Perceptual Motor Skills Assessment (CPMSA), a newly developed evaluation tool for children in early elementary grades. Its test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness were examined in 43 typically developing children and 26 children with handwriting difficulty. The CPMSA demonstrated excellent reliability across all subtests with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs)≥0.80. Significant moderate correlations between the domains of the CPMSA and corresponding gold standards including Beery VMI, the TVPS-3, and the eye-hand coordination subtest of the DTVP-2 demonstrated good concurrent validity. In addition, the CPMSA showed evidence of discriminant validity in samples of children with and without handwriting difficulty. This article provides evidence in support of the CPMSA. The CPMSA is a reliable, valid, and promising measure of visual perceptual motor skills for children in early elementary grades. Directions for future study and improvements to the assessment are discussed.

摘要

视觉感知运动技能被认为是书写困难的潜在原因。然而,目前还没有一种评估工具可以全面评估这些技能,并作为一种敏感的测量方法。本研究的目的是验证计算机感知运动技能评估(CPMSA),这是一种新开发的用于小学低年级儿童的评估工具。在 43 名发育正常的儿童和 26 名书写困难的儿童中,对其进行了重测信度、同时效度、判别效度和反应度的检验。CPMSA 在所有子测试中均具有出色的可靠性,组内相关系数(ICC)≥0.80。CPMSA 与包括 Beery VMI、TVPS-3 和 DTVP-2 的眼手协调子测试在内的相应金标准领域之间存在显著的中度相关性,表明其具有良好的同时效度。此外,CPMSA 在有和没有书写困难的儿童样本中均表现出判别效度的证据。本文为 CPMSA 提供了证据支持。CPMSA 是一种可靠、有效的、针对小学低年级儿童视觉感知运动技能的有前途的测量方法。讨论了未来研究和评估改进的方向。

相似文献

1
The Computerized Perceptual Motor Skills Assessment: A new visual perceptual motor skills evaluation tool for children in early elementary grades.计算机化知觉动作技能评估:一种适用于小学低年级儿童的新的视觉知觉动作技能评估工具。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Oct;69:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
Visual perceptual and handwriting skills in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.发育协调障碍儿童的视觉感知和书写技能
Hum Mov Sci. 2016 Oct;49:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
3
Initial psychometric evaluation of the Hartley Knows Writing Shapes Assessment Version 2 with typically developing children between the ages of 4 and 8.哈特利识写形状评估第二版在 4 至 8 岁正常发育儿童中的初步心理测量评估。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Feb;68(1):32-42. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12696. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
4
Predicting Handwriting Legibility in Taiwanese Elementary School Children.预测台湾小学生的笔迹清晰度。
Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Nov/Dec;70(6):7006220020p1-7006220020p9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.016865.
5
Reliability and validity of Handwriting Test for Preschool Children (HT-PRE): A new tool to assess the handwriting ability of preschool children aged 5-6 years old in Mainland China.《学龄前儿童书写测试(HT-PRE)的信度和效度:中国大陆 5-6 岁学龄前儿童书写能力评估的新工具》。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229786. eCollection 2020.
6
Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) Is Also Relevant for Computer, Smartphone, and Tablet Use by Adults: Introducing the Brief Box Clicking Test.视动整合(VMI)对于成人使用计算机、智能手机和平板电脑也很重要:引入简短的盒子点击测试。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Sep 1;78(5). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050680.
7
Writing Readiness Inventory Tool in Context (WRITIC): reliability and convergent validity.情境写作准备评估工具(WRITIC):信度与收敛效度
Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Apr;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12082. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
8
Kindergarten Visual-Perceptual and Motor Skills and Behavioral Traits Predict First-Grade Chinese Handwriting Legibility and Speed.幼儿园视知觉和运动技能与行为特征可预测一年级汉字书写的清晰度和速度。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jan 1;78(1). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050425.
9
The validity and reliability of developmental test of visual perception-2nd edition (DTVP-2).发展性视觉感知测试-第二版(DTVP-2)的有效性和可靠性。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013 Nov;33(4):426-39. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.757573. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
Seeing the gaps: a systematic review of visual perception tools for children with hemiplegia.发现差距:偏瘫儿童视觉感知工具的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(19-20):1854-65. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.549896. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual-motor integration in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: application of the computer-aided measure of visual-motor integration.儿童单侧脑瘫的视动整合:计算机辅助视动整合测量的应用。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Mar 19;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01335-8.
2
A novel tablet-based motor coordination test performs on par with the Beery VMI subtest and offers superior temporal metrics: findings from children with pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome.一种新型基于片剂的运动协调测试在表现上可与 Beery VMI 亚测验相媲美,并提供了更优的时间度量指标:来自儿科急性发作神经精神综合征儿童的研究结果。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 May;241(5):1421-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06612-x. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
A Tablet App for Handwriting Skill Screening at the Preliteracy Stage: Instrument Validation Study.
一款用于学前识字阶段手写技能筛查的平板电脑应用程序:工具验证研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Oct 22;8(4):e20126. doi: 10.2196/20126.
4
An overview and critique of the (TVPS-4).《电视知觉评估量表-4》(TVPS-4)概述与评论
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2018 Dec;31(2):59-68. doi: 10.1177/1569186118793847. Epub 2018 Sep 5.