• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《学龄前儿童书写测试(HT-PRE)的信度和效度:中国大陆 5-6 岁学龄前儿童书写能力评估的新工具》。

Reliability and validity of Handwriting Test for Preschool Children (HT-PRE): A new tool to assess the handwriting ability of preschool children aged 5-6 years old in Mainland China.

机构信息

Department of Child Health Care, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, Jiang Su, China.

Department of Child Health Care, Xuzhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiang Su, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229786. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229786
PMID:32119715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7051084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Handwriting ability is related to many neuronal functions, such as visual-perceptual skills, orthographic coding, motor planning and execution, kinesthetic feedback and visual-motor coordination. To date, there is no specific assessment tool for to assess preschool children's handwriting ability in Mainland China. Our study aimed to develop a tool to assess the handwriting ability of children aged 5-6 years old in Mainland China and to analyze its reliability and validity.

METHODS

The investigation comprised three phases: 1) original tool generation, 2) tool revision, 3) reliability analysis (i.e., interrater, test-retest) and validity analysis (i.e., content, criterion).

RESULTS

The sample included a total of 482 children. The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) was 0.74. The test-retest correlation coefficients ranged from 0.38 to 0.80. As expected, our data showed an improving trend in handwriting, and differences in respect to age and gender. When compared with the 'handwriting difficulty' group, each subtest score of children in the 'normal' group showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The correlation validity, compared with the visual-motor integration development test (VMI), was 0.17-0.52.

CONCLUSION

The Handwriting Test for Preschool Children (HT-PRE), which is a newly developed handwriting screening tool for preschool children aged 5-6 years old in Mainland China, has displayed a very good internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reproducibility, and good criterion-based validity, and has also shown good application prospects for handwriting difficulty screening in a clinical setting.

摘要

背景

书写能力与许多神经元功能有关,例如视觉感知技能、正字法编码、运动规划和执行、动觉反馈和视觉运动协调。迄今为止,中国大陆还没有专门用于评估学龄前儿童书写能力的评估工具。我们的研究旨在开发一种评估中国大陆 5-6 岁儿童书写能力的工具,并分析其信度和效度。

方法

该调查包括三个阶段:1)原始工具生成,2)工具修订,3)可靠性分析(即评分者间信度、重测信度)和有效性分析(即内容效度、效标关联效度)。

结果

样本共包括 482 名儿童。内部一致性(Cronbach alpha)为 0.74。重测信度相关系数范围为 0.38 至 0.80。正如预期的那样,我们的数据显示出书写能力的提高趋势,且在年龄和性别方面存在差异。与“书写困难”组相比,“正常”组的每个子测试得分均存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。与视觉运动整合发展测试(VMI)的相关效度为 0.17-0.52。

结论

为中国大陆 5-6 岁学龄前儿童开发的新的书写筛查工具——《学龄前儿童书写测试》(HT-PRE)具有很好的内部一致性、可接受的重测信度和良好的基于标准的效度,并且在临床环境中也具有良好的书写困难筛查应用前景。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of Handwriting Test for Preschool Children (HT-PRE): A new tool to assess the handwriting ability of preschool children aged 5-6 years old in Mainland China.《学龄前儿童书写测试(HT-PRE)的信度和效度:中国大陆 5-6 岁学龄前儿童书写能力评估的新工具》。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229786. eCollection 2020.
2
The Computerized Perceptual Motor Skills Assessment: A new visual perceptual motor skills evaluation tool for children in early elementary grades.计算机化知觉动作技能评估:一种适用于小学低年级儿童的新的视觉知觉动作技能评估工具。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Oct;69:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Development, reliability, and validity of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ).手写能力筛查问卷(HPSQ)的编制、信度及效度
Am J Occup Ther. 2008 May-Jun;62(3):298-307. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.3.298.
4
The reliability and validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire'07 for children aged 4-6 years in mainland China.《发育性协调障碍问卷(2007版)》在中国大陆4至6岁儿童中的信效度研究
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
5
Initial psychometric evaluation of the Hartley Knows Writing Shapes Assessment Version 2 with typically developing children between the ages of 4 and 8.哈特利识写形状评估第二版在 4 至 8 岁正常发育儿童中的初步心理测量评估。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Feb;68(1):32-42. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12696. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
6
Visual perceptual and handwriting skills in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.发育协调障碍儿童的视觉感知和书写技能
Hum Mov Sci. 2016 Oct;49:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
7
Assessment tool for visual perception deficits in cerebral visual impairment: reliability and validity.脑性视觉障碍患者视觉感知缺陷评估工具:信度和效度。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Jan;62(1):118-124. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14304. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Discriminant validity of the Visual Motor Integration Test in screening children with handwriting dysfunction.视动统合测验甄别书写障碍儿童的判别效度。
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Dec;109(3):770-82. doi: 10.2466/pms.109.3.770-782.
9
Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) Is Also Relevant for Computer, Smartphone, and Tablet Use by Adults: Introducing the Brief Box Clicking Test.视动整合(VMI)对于成人使用计算机、智能手机和平板电脑也很重要:引入简短的盒子点击测试。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Sep 1;78(5). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050680.
10
Writing Readiness Inventory Tool in Context (WRITIC): reliability and convergent validity.情境写作准备评估工具(WRITIC):信度与收敛效度
Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Apr;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12082. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpol questioned documents review 2019-2022.国际刑警组织对2019年至2022年文件的审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Feb 24;6:100300. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100300. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Developmental skills between kindergarten children with handwriting difficulties in Chinese and/or English.有中文和/或英文书写困难的幼儿园儿童之间的发展技能。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Jun;66(3):292-303. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12550. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
2
Computerised Handwriting Speed Test System (CHSTS): Validation of a handwriting assessment for Chinese secondary students.计算机化手写速度测试系统(CHSTS):针对中国中学生的一项手写评估的验证
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Feb;66(1):91-99. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12526. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
Influence of Grapheme and Syllable Learning on Handwriting Output of Chinese Characters in Children With Dictation Difficulties.
字素和音节学习对听写困难儿童汉字书写输出的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;9:1671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01671. eCollection 2018.
4
Examining Validity of the Compared With .检验与……相比的有效性。 (原英文表述不太完整,翻译可能会有些生硬,最好能有更完整准确的英文内容来进行高质量翻译)
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2019 Jul;39(3):167-175. doi: 10.1177/1539449218804529. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Chinese handwriting performance in preterm children in grade 2.二年级早产儿的汉字书写表现。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 19;13(6):e0199355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199355. eCollection 2018.
6
Handwriting assessment to distinguish comorbid learning difficulties from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese adolescents: A case-control study.中文青少年共患学习困难与注意缺陷多动障碍的笔迹评估:病例对照研究。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;27(4):e1718. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1718. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Development of the Handwriting Legibility Scale (HLS): A preliminary examination of Reliability and Validity.《笔迹清晰度量表(HLS)的编制:信度和效度的初步检验》
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Jan;72:240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
The impact of handwriting difficulties on compositional quality in children with developmental coordination disorder.发育性协调障碍儿童书写困难对作文质量的影响。
Br J Occup Ther. 2016 Oct;79(10):591-597. doi: 10.1177/0308022616650903. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Handwriting Development in Spanish Children With and Without Learning Disabilities: A Graphonomic Approach.有学习障碍和无学习障碍的西班牙儿童的笔迹发展:一种书写符号学方法。
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Sep/Oct;50(5):552-563. doi: 10.1177/0022219416633866. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
10
Evaluating fine motor coordination in children who are not ready for handwriting: which test should we take?评估尚未准备好书写的儿童的精细运动协调性:我们应该采用哪种测试?
Occup Ther Int. 2015 Jun;22(2):61-70. doi: 10.1002/oti.1385. Epub 2015 Feb 23.