Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université de Lyon, Bron, France; Volvo Group Trucks Technology (GTT), Saint Priest, France.
Volvo Group Trucks Technology (GTT), Saint Priest, France.
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
Existing literature does not draw conclusions as to which speedometer type is better for truck driving. A digital speedometer would be more beneficial when obtaining absolute and relative readings, while an analogue speedometer would be more efficient and less distracting when detecting dynamic speed changes. Redundant speedometers, which simultaneously present digital and analogue speedometers, appear increasingly in vehicles, but no information is available on their ergonomic qualities. This study compared three speedometers: digital speedometers, analogue speedometers, and redundant speedometers. This study compared the efficiency, usability and visual distraction measures for all three types of speedometers in a simulated truck driving setting. The task-dependant results were confirmed for the digital and analogue speedometer. The redundant speedometer combined the benefits of each type presented separately, which highlights interesting theoretical and applied implications.
现有文献并未得出哪种速度计类型更适合卡车驾驶的结论。在获取绝对和相对读数时，数字速度计更有优势，而在检测动态速度变化时，模拟速度计更高效且干扰更小。同时显示数字和模拟速度计的冗余速度计在车辆中越来越常见，但关于其人体工程学质量的信息尚不可用。本研究比较了三种速度计：数字速度计、模拟速度计和冗余速度计。本研究在模拟卡车驾驶环境中比较了所有三种速度计的效率、可用性和视觉干扰测量值。数字和模拟速度计的任务相关结果得到了确认。冗余速度计结合了每种单独呈现的类型的优势，这凸显了有趣的理论和应用意义。
