• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这个续航范围适合我吗?电动汽车用户的续航满意度。

Does this range suit me? Range satisfaction of battery electric vehicle users.

机构信息

Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems, Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Cognitive and Engineering Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.013
PMID:28802439
Abstract

User satisfaction is a vital design criterion for sustainable systems. The present research aimed to understand factors relating to individually perceived range satisfaction of battery electric vehicle (BEV) users. Data from a large-scale BEV field trial (N = 72) were analyzed. Apart from an initial drop in range satisfaction, increasing practical experience was related to increased range satisfaction. Classical indicators of users' mobility profiles (daily travel distances) were only weakly related to lower range satisfaction (not significant), after controlling for practical experience and preferred coverage of mobility needs. The regularity/predictability of users' mobility patterns, the percentage of journeys not coverable because of range issues, and users' individual comfortable range accounted for variance in range satisfaction. Finally, range satisfaction was related to key indicators of general BEV acceptance (e.g., purchase intentions). These results underline the complex dynamics involved in individual range satisfaction, as well as its central role for BEV acceptance.

摘要

用户满意度是可持续系统的一个重要设计标准。本研究旨在了解与电池电动汽车 (BEV) 用户个人感知续航满意度相关的因素。对一项大型 BEV 现场试验(N=72)的数据进行了分析。除了初始续航满意度下降外,随着实际经验的增加,续航满意度也随之增加。在控制了实际经验和移动需求的首选覆盖范围后,用户移动特征的经典指标(每日旅行距离)与较低的续航满意度(不显著)关系较弱。用户移动模式的规律性/可预测性、因续航问题无法覆盖的行程比例以及用户个人舒适续航范围解释了续航满意度的差异。最后,续航满意度与 BEV 接受度的关键指标(例如购买意向)有关。这些结果强调了个人续航满意度所涉及的复杂动态,以及它对 BEV 接受度的核心作用。

相似文献

1
Does this range suit me? Range satisfaction of battery electric vehicle users.这个续航范围适合我吗?电动汽车用户的续航满意度。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
2
Which Factors Can Protect Against Range Stress in Everyday Usage of Battery Electric Vehicles? Toward Enhancing Sustainability of Electric Mobility Systems.在纯电动汽车的日常使用中,哪些因素可以防止里程焦虑?迈向增强电动出行系统的可持续性。
Hum Factors. 2016 Feb;58(1):13-26. doi: 10.1177/0018720815614702. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety.了解电动汽车驾驶体验对里程焦虑的影响。
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):177-87. doi: 10.1177/0018720814546372.
4
How does experience impact the adoption willingness of battery electric vehicles? The role of psychological factors.经验如何影响电动汽车的采用意愿?心理因素的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(20):25230-25247. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08834-w. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Battery electric vehicles - implications for the driver interface.电池电动汽车——对驾驶员界面的影响。
Ergonomics. 2016 Mar;59(3):331-43. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1078914. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
6
Individual differences in BEV drivers' range stress during first encounter of a critical range situation.在首次遇到临界续航里程情况时,纯电动车辆(BEV)驾驶员续航里程压力方面的个体差异。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Nov;57:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Hazard detection in noise-related incidents - the role of driving experience with battery electric vehicles.噪声相关事件中的危险检测——驾驶经验在电池电动汽车中的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:380-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
8
The Mobile Charging Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows and Recharging Services.带充电服务和时间窗的移动充电车路径问题。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 Oct 8;2018:5075916. doi: 10.1155/2018/5075916. eCollection 2018.
9
Regenerative braking failures in battery electric vehicles and their impact on the driver.再生制动失效对电池电动汽车及其对驾驶员的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Sep;71:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Traffic collisions between electric mobility devices (wheelchairs) and motor vehicles: Accidents, hubris, or self-destructive behavior?电动移动设备(轮椅)与机动车辆之间的交通碰撞:事故、傲慢还是自我毁灭行为?
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;89(7):557-60. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181d8a346.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of battery utilization and energy consumption in the large-scale development of urban electric vehicles.评估城市电动汽车大规模发展中的电池利用和能耗。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 27;118(17). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017318118.
2
Method-oriented systematic review on the simple scale for acceptance measurement in advanced transport telematics.面向方法的高级交通远程信息处理中接受度测量简单量表的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248107. eCollection 2021.