Pottie Kevin, Welch Vivian, Morton Rachael, Akl Elie A, Eslava-Schmalbach Javier H, Katikireddi Vittal, Singh Jasvinder, Moja Lorenzo, Lang Eddy, Magrini Nicola, Thabane Lehana, Stanev Roger, Matovinovic Elizabeth, Snellman Alexandra, Briel Matthias, Shea Beverly, Tugwell Peter, Schunemann Holger, Guyatt Gordon, Alonso-Coello Pablo
Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Bruyere Research Institute University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Bruyere Research Institute University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process.
We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members.
Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples.
Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup.
本文旨在就如何将健康公平纳入GRADE(推荐分级的评估、制定与评价)证据到决策的过程提供详细指导。
我们基于GRADE证据到决策框架制定本指导意见,通过反复审查和修改文件草稿、项目组成员的当面讨论以及其他GRADE成员的意见进行完善。
无论是在一般指南还是针对弱势群体的指南中,都可能需要考虑对健康公平的影响。我们建议采用两种方法纳入公平性考量:(1)评估干预措施对公平性的潜在影响;(2)在判断或权衡每项证据到决策标准时纳入公平性考量。我们提供了指导并给出了示例。
指南制定小组应考虑建议对健康公平的影响,关注偏远和服务不足地区以及弱势群体。指南制定小组不妨在整个证据到决策框架中纳入公平性判断。这是关于在GRADE指南制定过程中考虑公平性的系列文章中的第四篇也是最后一篇。本系列文章来自GRADE公平性小组。