Suppr超能文献

在重病期间满足患者的情感和存在需求:展望随机对照试验的结果。

Addressing Patient Emotional and Existential Needs During Serious Illness: Results of the Outlook Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Palliative Care Section, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):898-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Few interventions exist to address patients' existential needs.

OBJECTIVES

Determine whether an intervention to address seriously ill patients' existential concerns improves preparation, completion (elements of quality of life [QOL] at end of life), and reduces anxiety and depression.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial comparing outlook intervention, relaxation meditation (RM), and usual care (UC). Measures included primary-a validated measure of QOL at the end of life and secondary-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, anxiety (Profile of Mood States), depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale), and spiritual well-being (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being). Qualitative interviews assessed outlook intervention acceptability. Enrolled patients were nonhospice eligible veterans with advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, or end-stage liver disease.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 221) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to outlook, RM, and UC. Patients were 96% males, 46% with cancer, 58.4% married, and 43.9% of African American origin. Compared with UC, outlook participants had higher preparation (a validated measure of QOL at the end of life) (mean difference 1.1; 95% CI 0.2, 2.0; P = 0.02) and mean completion (1.6; 95% CI 0.05, 3.1; P = 0.04) at the first but not second postassessment. Compared with RM, outlook participants did not show significant differences over time. Exploratory analyses indicated that in subgroups with cancer and low sense of peace, outlook participants had improved preparation at first and not second postassessment, as compared with UC (mean difference 1.4; 95% CI 0.03, 2.7; P = 0.04) (mean difference = 1.8; 95% CI 0.3, 3.3; P = 0.02), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outlook had an impact on social well-being and preparation compared with UC. The lack of impact on anxiety and depression differs from previous results among hospice patients. Results suggest that outlook is not demonstratively effective in populations not experiencing existential or emotional distress.

摘要

背景

很少有干预措施可以满足患者的存在需求。

目的

确定一种针对重病患者存在问题的干预措施是否可以提高准备度、完成度(生命终期生活质量的要素),并减轻焦虑和抑郁。

方法

一项针对展望干预、放松冥想(RM)和常规护理(UC)的随机对照试验。测量包括主要——生命终期生活质量的验证性指标,以及次要——癌症治疗一般功能评估、焦虑(心境状态问卷)、抑郁(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)和精神健康(慢性疾病治疗功能评估-精神健康幸福感)。定性访谈评估了展望干预的可接受性。纳入的患者是非临终关怀合格的患有晚期癌症、充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、终末期肾病或终末期肝病的退伍军人。

结果

患者(n=221)被随机分配 1:1:1 至展望、RM 和 UC 组。患者 96%为男性,46%患有癌症,58.4%已婚,43.9%为非裔美国人。与 UC 相比,展望组患者的准备度更高(生命终期生活质量的验证性指标)(平均差异 1.1;95%CI 0.2, 2.0;P=0.02),且在第一次和第二次随访中完成度更高(1.6;95%CI 0.05, 3.1;P=0.04)。与 RM 相比,展望组患者在随访过程中未显示出显著差异。探索性分析表明,在癌症和低安宁感亚组中,与 UC 相比,展望组患者在第一次和第二次随访中准备度均有所提高(平均差异 1.4;95%CI 0.03, 2.7;P=0.04)(平均差异=1.8;95%CI 0.3, 3.3;P=0.02)。

结论

与 UC 相比,展望对社会幸福感和准备度有影响。与临终关怀患者的先前结果不同,展望对焦虑和抑郁没有影响。结果表明,展望在没有经历存在或情感困扰的人群中没有表现出明显的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验