Grosse-Steffen Thomas, Krämer Malin, Tuschy Benjamin, Weiss Christel, Sütterlin Marc, Berlit Sebastian
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Oct;296(4):771-776. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4486-6. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
Aim of the study was to investigate the topical application of a eutectic mixture of lidocaine/prilocaine (EMLA) cream after caesarean section (CS) and its effect on postoperative pain, time to mobilisation, and time to discharge.
A total of 189 pregnant women were enrolled; full data sets were available for 139 of them, who were prospectively randomised to receive either placebo (control group) or EMLA cream (study group) on the CS lesion directly as well as 24 h after surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed 24 and 48 h after surgery using the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Additional analgesic pain medication on demand was assessed in both groups.
A total of 62 women were allocated randomly to the study and 77 patients to the control group before primary CS. There were no statistically significant differences regarding demographic and surgical parameters comparing both collectives. In addition, the postoperative total pain scores after 24 h [McGill total: 38.5 (0-102) vs. 50 (0-120) p = 0.0889] as well as after 48 h [24 (0-79) vs. 30.5 (0-92); p = 0.1455] showed no significant differences. Furthermore, time to mobilisation (hours) [9.68 (2.18-51.38) vs. 9.47 (4.18-41.77); p = 0.5919] and time to discharge (hours) [98.6 (54.08-170.15) vs. 98.2 (43.45-195.87); p = 0.5331] were comparable.
The postoperative application of EMLA cream after CS did not reduce postoperative pain or time to mobilisation or discharge, so that its use in this context has to be seen critically.
本研究旨在探讨剖宫产术后应用利多卡因/丙胺卡因共晶混合物(EMLA)乳膏的局部应用及其对术后疼痛、活动时间和出院时间的影响。
共纳入189名孕妇;其中139名有完整数据集,她们被前瞻性随机分为两组,一组在剖宫产切口处直接以及术后24小时接受安慰剂(对照组),另一组接受EMLA乳膏(研究组)。术后24小时和48小时使用麦吉尔疼痛问卷简表(SF-MPQ)评估术后疼痛。评估两组按需使用的额外镇痛药物。
在初次剖宫产术前,共有62名女性被随机分配到研究组,77名患者被分配到对照组。两组在人口统计学和手术参数方面无统计学显著差异。此外,术后24小时[麦吉尔总分:38.5(0 - 102)对50(0 - 120),p = 0.0889]以及48小时后[24(0 - 79)对30.5(0 - 92);p = 0.1455]的术后总疼痛评分均无显著差异。此外,活动时间(小时)[9.68(2.18 - 51.38)对9.47(4.18 - 41.77);p = 0.5919]和出院时间(小时)[98.6(54.08 - 170.15)对98.2(43.45 - 195.87);p = 0.5331]具有可比性。
剖宫产术后应用EMLA乳膏并未减轻术后疼痛、缩短活动时间或出院时间,因此在这种情况下其使用必须谨慎看待。