Suppr超能文献

利多卡因离子导入法与利多卡因和丙胺卡因共熔混合物(EMLA)用于局部给药局部麻醉的比较。

Comparison of iontophoresis of lidocaine with a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) for topically administered local anesthesia.

作者信息

Greenbaum S S, Bernstein E F

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994 Sep;20(9):579-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1994.tb00150.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Almost all dermatologic surgery is accomplished using local anesthesia. To make our patients more comfortable, there is a constant search for less painful methods of administering anesthetic agents. Topical EMLA as well as iontophoresis are both useful in this regard.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we compared topical EMLA with lidocaine delivered by iontophoresis in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Our goal was to assess the degree of anesthesia obtained as well as the relative rapidity of onset.

METHODS

A double-blind controlled study was performed on 10 healthy volunteers between 26 and 37 years of age. Three test sites were placed on each forearm. EMLA or a moisturizer control was placed on two of the three test sites on each arm. Each site was wiped free of cream and tested for sensitivity to pinprick 30 and 60 minutes after cream placement. One iontophoretic unit was placed on each forearm. Both units were saturated with anesthesia with the control unit being turned off. Sensitivity to pinprick was evaluated at the iontophoretic sites and one of the EMLA sites 30 minutes after site placement on the subject. The additional EMLA-treated site was tested in the same manner 60 minutes after placement.

RESULTS

Both EMLA cream and the iontophoretic unit delivered topical anesthesia greater than the control. Significantly more anesthesia was acquired 1 hour after application of EMLA than was seen 30 minutes earlier. The iontophoretic patch-treated area provided greater anesthesia than the EMLA-treated sites evaluated 30 and 60 minutes after placement. Both modalities provided significant anesthesia when left in place for 60 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Both iontophoresis of lidocaine and topical EMLA delivered significant, and sometimes complete, local anesthesia. A greater degree of anesthesia is delivered via iontophoresis after 30 minutes as compared with EMLA left on the skin for 30 or 60 minutes. Both modalities have important and unique advantages and disadvantages. Topical EMLA and iontophoretically delivered lidocaine are both valuable tools for the dermatologic surgeon.

摘要

背景

几乎所有皮肤科手术都采用局部麻醉完成。为了让患者更舒适,人们一直在寻找痛苦较小的麻醉剂给药方法。在这方面,外用复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)以及离子导入法都很有用。

目的

在本研究中,我们在一项双盲安慰剂对照试验中比较了外用EMLA与通过离子导入法给予利多卡因的效果。我们的目标是评估获得的麻醉程度以及起效的相对速度。

方法

对10名年龄在26至37岁之间的健康志愿者进行了一项双盲对照研究。在每个前臂上设置三个测试部位。在每只手臂的三个测试部位中的两个部位涂抹EMLA或保湿剂对照。在涂抹乳膏30分钟和60分钟后,擦拭每个部位的乳膏,并测试对针刺的敏感性。在每个前臂上放置一个离子导入装置。两个装置都用麻醉剂浸透,对照装置关闭。在将装置放置在受试者身上30分钟后,评估离子导入部位和其中一个EMLA部位对针刺的敏感性。在放置60分钟后,以相同方式测试另一个经EMLA处理的部位。

结果

EMLA乳膏和离子导入装置提供的局部麻醉效果均优于对照。应用EMLA 1小时后获得的麻醉效果明显优于30分钟时。离子导入贴片处理的区域在放置30分钟和60分钟后提供的麻醉效果优于经EMLA处理的部位。当放置60分钟时,两种方式都能提供显著的麻醉效果。

结论

利多卡因离子导入法和外用EMLA都能提供显著的,有时甚至是完全的局部麻醉。与留在皮肤上30分钟或60分钟的EMLA相比,离子导入法在30分钟后能提供更高程度的麻醉。两种方式都有重要且独特的优缺点。外用EMLA和离子导入法给予的利多卡因都是皮肤科外科医生的宝贵工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验