Joosten Sophie C, Deckers Ivette Ag, Aarts Maureen J, Hoeben Ann, van Roermund Joep G, Smits Kim M, Melotte Veerle, van Engeland Manon, Tjan-Heijnen Vivianne C
Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Epigenomics. 2017 Sep;9(9):1243-1257. doi: 10.2217/epi-2017-0040. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
Despite numerous published prognostic methylation markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), none of these have yet changed patient management. Our aim is to systematically review and evaluate the literature on prognostic DNA methylation markers for RCC.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We conducted an exhaustive search of PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE up to April 2017 and identified 49 publications. Studies were reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, assessed for their reporting quality using the Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) criteria, and were graded to determine the level of evidence (LOE) for each biomarker.
We identified promoter methylation of BNC1, SCUBE3, GATA5, SFRP1, GREM1, RASSF1A, PCDH8, LAD1 and NEFH as promising prognostic markers. Extensive methodological heterogeneity across the included studies was observed, which hampers comparability and reproducibility of results, providing a possible explanation why these biomarkers do not reach the clinic.
Potential prognostic methylation markers for RCC have been identified, but they require further validation in prospective studies to determine their true clinical value.
尽管已发表了众多关于肾细胞癌(RCC)的预后甲基化标志物,但这些标志物均未改变患者的治疗方案。我们的目的是系统回顾和评估有关RCC预后DNA甲基化标志物的文献。
我们对截至2017年4月的PubMed、EMBASE和MEDLINE进行了全面检索,共识别出49篇出版物。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明对研究进行回顾,使用肿瘤标志物预后研究报告建议(REMARK)标准评估其报告质量,并进行分级以确定每个生物标志物的证据水平(LOE)。
我们确定BNC1、SCUBE3、GATA5、SFRP1、GREM1、RASSF1A、PCDH8、LAD1和NEFH的启动子甲基化是有前景的预后标志物。在所纳入的研究中观察到广泛的方法学异质性,这妨碍了结果的可比性和可重复性,这可能解释了为什么这些生物标志物尚未应用于临床。
已确定了RCC潜在的预后甲基化标志物,但它们需要在前瞻性研究中进一步验证以确定其真正的临床价值。