• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部骨折:手术干预的适当时机。

Hip Fractures: Appropriate Timing to Operative Intervention.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3314-3318. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.023
PMID:28807469
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to (1) identify the incidence of surgical delay in hip fractures, (2) evaluate the time point surgical delay puts patients at increased risk for complications, and (3) identify risk factors for surgical delay in the setting of surgical management of hip fractures.

METHODS

A multi-center database was queried for patients of 60 years of age or older undergoing surgical treatment of a hip fracture. Surgical delay was defined by days from admission until surgical intervention. Univariate analyses and multivariate analyses were performed on all groups.

RESULTS

A total of 4215 patients underwent surgery for their hip fracture. Of those experiencing surgical delay, 3304 (78%) patients experienced surgical delay of ≥1 day, 1314 (31%) had delay of ≥2 days, and 480 (11%) experienced delay of ≥3 days. There was a significant difference in complications if patients experienced surgical delay of ≥2 days (P ≤ .01). Multivariate analyses identified multiple risk factors for delay of ≥2 days including congestive heart failure (odds ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 2.04-4.66) and body mass index ≥40 (odds ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.31-4.08). Subgroup analysis identified that patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were not at risk for complications with surgical delay of ≥2 days.

CONCLUSION

Surgical delay of ≥2 days in the setting of hip fractures is common and confers an increased risk of complications in those undergoing non-total hip arthroplasty procedures. We recommend surgical intervention prior to 48 hours from hospital admission when possible. Healthcare systems can utilize our non-modifiable risk factors when performing quality assessment and cost accounting.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在:(1) 确定髋部骨折手术延迟的发生率;(2) 评估手术延迟使患者发生并发症的风险增加的时间点;(3) 在髋部骨折手术治疗的情况下,确定手术延迟的危险因素。

方法

对接受髋部骨折手术治疗的 60 岁及以上患者的多中心数据库进行了查询。手术延迟定义为从入院到手术干预的天数。对所有组进行了单因素分析和多因素分析。

结果

共有 4215 例患者因髋部骨折接受手术治疗。在经历手术延迟的患者中,3304 例(78%)患者的手术延迟≥1 天,1314 例(31%)患者的手术延迟≥2 天,480 例(11%)患者的手术延迟≥3 天。如果患者经历手术延迟≥2 天,并发症的发生率存在显著差异(P≤0.01)。多因素分析确定了≥2 天延迟的多个危险因素,包括充血性心力衰竭(比值比 3.09,95%置信区间 2.04-4.66)和体重指数≥40(比值比 2.31,95%置信区间 1.31-4.08)。亚组分析确定,接受全髋关节置换术的患者在手术延迟≥2 天的情况下,不会增加并发症的风险。

结论

髋部骨折手术延迟≥2 天较为常见,且在非全髋关节置换术患者中增加了并发症的风险。我们建议在入院后 48 小时内尽可能进行手术干预。医疗保健系统在进行质量评估和成本核算时,可以使用我们无法改变的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Hip Fractures: Appropriate Timing to Operative Intervention.髋部骨折:手术干预的适当时机。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3314-3318. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
2
Incidence of and Preoperative Risk Factors for Surgical Delay in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.初次全髋关节置换术中手术延迟的发生率及术前危险因素:来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的分析
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2432-2436. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.054. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Does time from fracture to surgery affect mortality and intraoperative medical complications for hip fracture patients? An observational study of 73 557 patients reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.从骨折到手术的时间是否会影响髋部骨折患者的死亡率和术中医疗并发症?对挪威髋部骨折登记处报告的 73557 名患者进行的观察性研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1129-1137. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2019-0295.R1.
4
Reducing complications and overall healthcare costs of hip fracture management: a retrospective study on the application of a Diagnostic Therapeutic Pathway in the Cosenza General Hospital.降低髋部骨折治疗的并发症和总体医疗成本:科森扎综合医院诊断治疗路径应用的回顾性研究
Ann Ig. 2018 May-Jun;30(3):191-199. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2210.
5
Delay in Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of Patient-Specific and Hospital-Specific Risk Factors.髋部骨折手术延迟:患者特异性和医院特异性风险因素分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Aug;29(8):343-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000313.
6
There is no weekend effect in hip fracture surgery - A comprehensive analysis of outcomes.髋部骨折手术不存在周末效应——结局的综合分析
Surgeon. 2018 Oct;16(5):259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Poor Short-term Outcomes for Hip Fracture Surgery.术前低白蛋白血症预示髋部骨折手术短期预后不良。
Orthopedics. 2018 Nov 1;41(6):e789-e796. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180912-03. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.弗兰克·斯廷奇菲尔德奖:股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术并非典型的诊断相关分组470:一项倾向匹配队列研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4868-2.
9
Timing of surgery for hip fractures in the elderly: A retrospective cohort study.老年人髋部骨折手术时机:一项回顾性队列研究。
Injury. 2018 Oct;49(10):1848-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
10
Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture.老年社区居住男性退伍军人髋部骨折患者的危险因素、手术治疗及预后
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):34-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00065.

引用本文的文献

1
Waiting time and 30-day mortality association in elderly patients having hip fracture surgery.老年髋部骨折手术患者的等待时间与30天死亡率的关联
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03140-z.
2
Avoidable and unavoidable delays in hip fracture surgery : a prospective observational study of who, what, and why?髋部骨折手术中可避免和不可避免的延迟:关于何人、何事及原因的前瞻性观察研究
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Aug 5;6(8):876-885. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0083.R1.
3
Advancements in the Optimization of Surgical Timing in Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures: A Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.
老年髋部骨折患者手术时机优化的进展:叙述性综述与未来展望
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Jun 24;20:881-894. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S526209. eCollection 2025.
4
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index as Predictors of One-Year Mortality in Older Patients After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年营养风险指数和预后营养指数作为髋部骨折手术后老年患者一年死亡率的预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 May 9;16:21514593251340568. doi: 10.1177/21514593251340568. eCollection 2025.
5
Immediate admission to the surgery hospital significantly optimises quality indicators in older patients with hip fractures: A before-and-after study.立即入住外科医院可显著优化老年髋部骨折患者的质量指标:一项前后对照研究。
J Frailty Aging. 2025 Jun;14(3):100014. doi: 10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100014. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
6
Association between frailty, as measured by the FRAIL scale, and 1-year mortality in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.通过FRAIL量表测量的衰弱与接受髋部骨折手术的老年患者1年死亡率之间的关联。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05716-z.
7
[Association of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures: A cross-sectional study].老年髋部骨折患者术前C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值与死亡率的关系:一项横断面研究
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jan;30(12):907-913. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.21433.
8
Management of Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: An Institutional Experience at a District General Hospital.股骨假体周围骨折的管理:一家区综合医院的机构经验
Cureus. 2024 Nov 21;16(11):e74149. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74149. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Surgery for Geriatric Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk due to Aortic Stenosis is Safe and Effective.单侧脊髓麻醉用于因主动脉瓣狭窄而具有高心血管风险的老年髋部骨折手术患者是安全有效的。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2024 Aug 30;15:21514593241280908. doi: 10.1177/21514593241280908. eCollection 2024.
10
Early surgical treatment using regional clinical pathways to reduce the length of postoperative hospital stay in hip fracture patients: A retrospective analysis using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database.采用区域临床路径的早期手术治疗可减少髋部骨折患者术后住院时间:使用日本诊断程序组合数据库的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0282766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282766. eCollection 2024.